• NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    73
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    He was fined what he profitted from fraud that the judges agree he committed, plus interest. In what world is that excessive?

    Wow… i saw the headlines but didn’t realize this was the case. Not even punitive fines. Literally this is the ABSOLUTE MINIMUM it could be without fraud being profitable.

    • thanks AV@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      2 days ago

      In the 323-page decision, Judge Moulton said that American voters had “obviously rendered a verdict” on Trump’s political career.

      “This bench today unanimously derails the effort to destroy his business,” the judge wrote.

      Judge says voters gave him that money fair and square

      • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        1 day ago

        “This bench today unanimously derails the effort to destroy his business,” the judge wrote.

        The entire business was fraudulent, top to bottom, it SHOULD be dismantled. That’s like a judge whining that it’s unfair to put Al Capone out of business.

    • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 day ago

      without fraud being profitable.

      Actually… scratch that.

      With this fine, it actually was profitable. Interest is always lower than what someone could actually earn on the funds if they just dropped it into some broad market ETF, or reinvested it to commit more fraud.