• BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      17 hours ago

      2 were for jobs, and one was after money turned up missing. We all knew who took it, but they wanted to polygraph two other people first, before testing her, and I was chosen.

      I would take it for a job, and would probably lie just for fun, but if it was because I was accused of a crime, and it could contribute to me going to prison, I would absolutely refuse.

    • burntbacon@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Probably applying for certain jobs. I know that any job touching sensitive information from courts is required to have had employees tested before getting a job, at least in my area.

      • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        19 hours ago

        This is insane. It selects for only incredibly stupid people who don’t believe in reality getting the job.

        • burntbacon@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          10 hours ago

          only incredibly stupid people who don’t believe in reality

          Nah, it’s worse than that. It selects for people who are willing to submit to things they know are bullshit when told to do so, because they think the outcome is worth it. If I am recalling this correctly, I think there are actually laws prohibiting polygraph tests for job applications, but there are specific exceptions for these jobs. It’s absolutely insane. That means there were lobbyists somewhere making sure that their industry was given an exception when the politicians were writing the law. Like, I can’t even imagine who would be paying for those lobbyists.