VetOfTheSeas@discuss.online to Fuck AI@lemmy.world · 1 month agoSpotify Execs Bet People Will Pay for AI Music. Stock Price Plungesgizmodo.comexternal-linkmessage-square71linkfedilinkarrow-up1499arrow-down13cross-posted to: technology@lemmy.world
arrow-up1496arrow-down1external-linkSpotify Execs Bet People Will Pay for AI Music. Stock Price Plungesgizmodo.comVetOfTheSeas@discuss.online to Fuck AI@lemmy.world · 1 month agomessage-square71linkfedilinkcross-posted to: technology@lemmy.world
minus-squareIlovethebomb@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up92·1 month ago The tool has yet to launch, but when it does, it will be a paid add-on. They think people will pay extra for this?
minus-squaregravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10·1 month agoI choose to parse “tool” as a disparaging epithet in this context, instead of the classical definition
minus-squareLeon@pawb.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up7·1 month agoThey’ll move the no-ads thing to it so then they can show the shareholders how great AI is for their business even though people only get it to get rid of the ads.
minus-squareTrackinDaKraken@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·1 month agoThey patted themselves on the back for calling it a “tool”, rather than an assistant, or some other anthropomorphic term. “See, we’re being honest with our users. That has to count for something.”
They think people will pay extra for this?
I choose to parse “tool” as a disparaging epithet in this context, instead of the classical definition
They’ll move the no-ads thing to it so then they can show the shareholders how great AI is for their business even though people only get it to get rid of the ads.
They patted themselves on the back for calling it a “tool”, rather than an assistant, or some other anthropomorphic term.
“See, we’re being honest with our users. That has to count for something.”