• skisnow@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 days ago

    I wish PeerTube worked. For a while I tried just leaving in running on the theory that it might help out, but it didn’t seem to do anything. Not sure if I’m doing it wrong?

    • rumba@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 days ago

      I’m running a private, unfederated node; it works. I watch TILVIDS whenever I can find something on there.

      This is not an “if you build it, they will come” scenario,

      There’s no monetization, so there are almost no content creators.

      Creators generally don’t do it for free.

      Good creators rely on income from the videos to produce higher-quality videos

      Youtube: surfaces creators’ videos pays creators hosts the videos handles CDN

      Peertube: The creator pays to host the video (largely against their ISP’s wishes) There’s no surfacing There’s no payments If you’re lucky peertube doesn’t need CDN.

      Even if they go all patreon, they’re still not getting that extra cash, surfacing, and free hosting that youtube does.

      We need some kind of FOSS Patreon and to have Peertube do some kind of partner/recommendation engine.

      • Poxlox@lemmy.world
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        I’d rather money not be involved. There’s plenty of people willing to release good content regardless. I’d actually say YouTubes monetization is what made it shitty

        • Holytimes@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          15 hours ago

          No money means no videos. That’s just facts, you can bitch moan and cry if you want. But till money gets involved your not going to see anything actually meaningfully grow.

          Video production is just too costly to produce even on a hobbyists level. Either in time or money.

          • Poxlox@lemmy.world
            cake
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 hours ago

            Poxlox “bitch and moan and cry” huh? Yeah that’s why it worked for youtube for 7 years from 2005 until 2012 when they openly monetized. Shut the fuck up.

        • rumba@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          There’s plenty of people willing to release good content regardless.

          But there really aren’t. They would be all over the free platforms that have existed for years. But Peertube is nearly bereft of quality content, there are maybe a dozen regular creators that make anything interesting enough to 50% of the population to watch.

      • ten8tp@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        I’m not shilling for LMG, but something like Floatplane would make sense. You pay per creator for their extra content and ad free viewing and the cut goes in favor to the creator. Of course Floatplane has to also make money. They’re not in it to serve you ads or use your data to make money. If that took off I could easily see people paying 3-5 creators monthly to watch their videos ad free with extras on one platform.

        • rumba@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Nebula has more and is cheaper. I had some interest in Floatplane. Last time I looked at it, Youtube was cheaper for my use case and them not listing creators up front is bad news.

    • happydoors@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Same, dude. The power users will assume everyone has the time to assemble/learn the skill of setting it up. That being said, it’s on my list of things to figure out one day!

      • skisnow@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        yeah, one of the responses lower down made me realize why PeerTube is unlikely to be a success any time soon - it’s not something the typical YouTube user has to deal with.

      • skisnow@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        I wanted it to not be dog slow, because every one I tried spent all its time buffering. I’m not really sure how the architecture of it works but it seemed to suggest some kind of p2p thing so thought that leaving the window open might seed it? But either it didn’t or just nobody was interested.

        • WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          you are not seeding by just leaving the window open on any peertube page. you are only seeding the specific video you have opened, if you have opened one, and probably not the complete video just the last segments you still have cached. this p2p sharing is mostly for when a certain video gets popular, to help with peek load, and for live streams. if the video was buffering for a long time it’s probably because the server did not have enough upload bandwidth, and no other viewer had the video segments.

          there is another load balancing system that peertube supports, they can clone videos fromneach other and help serving them: https://docs.joinpeertube.org/admin/following-instances#platforms-redundancy

            • Holytimes@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              15 hours ago

              It’s the truth but it also is fantastic proof why the entire concept is doa. The fact this needs explaining at all or is even a problem. Means it’s a non viable system.

              Even technical users aren’t going to want to have to fiddle and tinker and read documentation for base entertainment.

              It either works or it’s worthless. That’s the bar you have to pass for basic entertainment.

              • rumba@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                14 hours ago

                Because one person made some bad guesses that they need to do something special, it’s worthless?

                you follow a link, the video plays

                https://tilvids.com/w/2VgZ8Tw2jcBj19cn4f8RKW

                you don’t need to know more than that, you don’t need to fiddle.

                If it takes off, people will setup more servers and probably setup caching for a fee.

            • WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              lol half the comments on lemmy have single downvotes. I don’t know what’s happening but I don’t worry about it

        • rumba@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          It never buffers for me, but I do have a full gig and super low latency