inari@piefed.zip to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 10 天前AI/LLM Usage Becoming A "Denial of Service Attack" On Open-Source Project Maintainerswww.phoronix.comexternal-linkmessage-square20linkfedilinkarrow-up1248arrow-down14
arrow-up1244arrow-down1external-linkAI/LLM Usage Becoming A "Denial of Service Attack" On Open-Source Project Maintainerswww.phoronix.cominari@piefed.zip to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 10 天前message-square20linkfedilink
minus-squarebluGill@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up21arrow-down2·10 天前If you know what you’re doing, AI can be a very useful tool. However, a lot of people have no clue what they’re doing and they use AI to amplify their incompetence.
minus-squaredandi8@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up17arrow-down2·10 天前Maybe one day someone can actually prove the mythical usefulness of AI beyond software devs who think they’re 19% faster but are actually 10% slower.
minus-squareschipelblorp@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·10 天前Yes. They could definitely fund studies to do so! They have the money! Hmm.
minus-squareCrit@lemmy.wtflinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·9 天前That study was redone and the results were less conclusive the second time around
minus-squaredandi8@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up1·9 天前They were less conclusive because they couldn’t find participants. Probably because they paid a third of what the previous study did.
minus-squarephil@lemmy.openitco.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·9 天前I haven’t met a single AI user who doesn’t claim (s)he uses it in a smart way.
If you know what you’re doing, AI can be a very useful tool. However, a lot of people have no clue what they’re doing and they use AI to amplify their incompetence.
Maybe one day someone can actually prove the mythical usefulness of AI beyond software devs who think they’re 19% faster but are actually 10% slower.
Yes. They could definitely fund studies to do so! They have the money! Hmm.
That study was redone and the results were less conclusive the second time around
They were less conclusive because they couldn’t find participants. Probably because they paid a third of what the previous study did.
I haven’t met a single AI user who doesn’t claim (s)he uses it in a smart way.