• anon_8675309@lemmy.world
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    11 hours ago

    I don’t like conspiracy theories but hugging face was bought, tens of thousands of Mac’s were bought, RAM is “indefinitely “ high priced.

    Starting to feel someone doesn’t want the self hosted AI to get legs.

    • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Self hosting also requires a ton of RAM because each individual user has to load a (usually slightly smaller) model + KV cache, whereas for hosted, they load the huge-ass model once (per cluster) and then store KV caches for a bunch of users, which has better scaling.

      The memory companies win whether you self-host or pay a subscription. They might win more if you self-host because look at the cost of self-hosting, it’s actually pretty steep if you don’t have the hardware already from the before times.

    • HertzDentalBar@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 hours ago

      It’s just hyper capitalism unfortunately.

      Self hosting isnt a threat to them, most folks ain’t doing that. And those of us who do already block most of their ways to generate revenue of our usage, so we don’t really matter to them.

  • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Unavoidably high prices are unavoidable says company who’s actions are causing prices to be high

    Yeah. Sure.

    • Blackmist@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Chinese companies are not investing in very expensive RAM fabrication plants in order to sell it on the cheap…

  • elucubra@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    95
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    Bullshit. Chinese RAM is ramping up to world scale levels. LLMs are reaching massive diminishing returns points, and open weights local AI setups that are near frontier level, and which can be run on consumer level hardware are already here, and getting very hardware efficient. The AI bubble burst is very close. Memory makers are pushing FOMO buying.

    • Pringles@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Yea, I wouldn’t be surprised if Samsung and SK Hynix would come to regret their deals with OpenAI once the Chinese have ramped up production and price them out of the market.

    • Dnb@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      14 hours ago

      The local models require massive amounts of ram that isn’t available for most consumer hardware

      I do hope the bubble bursts soon but low ram and local ai aren’t compatible

    • Mereo@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      22 hours ago

      This. As with any technology, it will always improve. The American government helped the Chinese by barring the chips from them, meaning they had to program more efficient models.

      • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        We don’t know if they’re actually more efficient because ClosedAI and Anthropic won’t tell us how (in)efficient their models are, whether they’re running quants, etc. Kimi K3 is about 3 terabytes of VRAM unquantized so I wouldn’t call the Chinese models super efficient either. The “efficient” models are the distillations and particularly quantized versions of some Chinese models. Nothing stopping ClosedAI and Anthropic from doing the same if they’re willing to lose a bit in accuracy.

  • SpruceBringsteen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    61
    ·
    1 day ago

    Pay attention to history. Supply crunches like this are followed by supply glut.

    There’s a reason why a company like SanDisk is signing multi year fixed price contracts now with the big data guys. That’s not a bet on hardware prices continuing to rise.

    • unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yeah this is like when the cops investigated themselves and find no wrongdoing. Why would anyone listen to the chip mafia when they have only their own interests in mind. They want you to think that there is no point in waiting for prices to drop, when that is obviously what everyone should be doing right now. Basically everyone should boycott the entire semiconductor industry as much as possible.

  • noli@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    75
    ·
    1 day ago

    RAM salesman says RAM prices should bstay obscenely high. Shocking!

  • gedaliyah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    23 hours ago

    Sure, as long as you don’t account for the AI bubble ever bursting. After that, memory will be cheap. We’ll be living in an economic hellscape, but the memory will be cheap.

      • gedaliyah@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        14 hours ago

        The price is only high because of the artificial demand from all the data centers. Manufacturers are increasing production capacity to provide more supply. Once the bubble bursts, that demand will drop, but the production capacity will still be there. Supply and demand. Price will go down.

        • madcaesar@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          13 hours ago

          I thought of the problem is they aren’t ramping up production because they think AI is a bubble

          • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 hours ago

            First new fabs are being opened this or next year last I heard. AI boom started in 2022 and fab construction and setup time is said to be 4 years (or more if there are issues).

            Of course the question is, will they be making more DDR or more HBM…

          • gedaliyah@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 hours ago

            No, they are definitely ramping up production, just not nearly fast enough. Chip factories take longer to build than data centers.

    • village604@adultswim.fan
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      20 hours ago

      No, it’s because they switched their manufacturing to chips used in AI datacenters, which aren’t the same as what is in consumer hardware.

      The price fixing agreements will happen after the bubble pops, assuming the demand actually drops.

      My prediction is that the intent is to kill the consumer hardware market so we have to subscribe to a virtual desktop.

      • adarza@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        14 hours ago

        and we’re screwed… who’s to say china won’t end up rationing their own new-found capacity? enough for the domestic market, perhaps that of a few small important allies… and then put the rest into their own data centers. the global market is only gonna get what they don’t need or want themselves.

  • Photonic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Through 2030? I was hoping the AI bubble would have burst by then…. I really should have gone for that 64gb

    • Laser@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      53
      ·
      1 day ago

      Keep in mind this is a statement by a manufacturer who’s trying to get his customers to sign long term contracts at current prices, so it’s in their interest to have people believe that the shortage continues.

      Doesn’t mean it’s not possible, bit it should be read in that context

      • alakey@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        There’s also no actual shortage to begin with, it’s a sham through and through.

        • Photonic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 day ago

          What do you mean? The fact that the tech corps building the data centres are useless fluff doesn’t mean the memory isn’t being bought, or that there isn’t an actual shortage.

          Sure the chip companies are probably doing some OPEC style shenanigans, but for all intents and purposes, there is a shortage driving up the price.

          • alakey@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            A real shortage would imply that they have no capacity to produce RAM in quantities required to satisfy the market demand. They do and they simply choose not to do that. They also continuously keep throwing in these “news” about RAM prices staying high for a decade to come, driving panic purchases up to further solidify “shortage” claims in the consumer market.

            • 4am@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              10
              ·
              1 day ago

              What they are choosing is to not produce anything for the consumer market any longer.

              They see these big companies trying to corner the market on cloud services and AI and they’re betting the future is letting these guys control everything.

              If all consumers’ money has to be funneled through like 3 or 4 providers, best to bet on those providers and their subcontractors.

              This is why capitalism sucks ass.

      • ramble81@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        23 hours ago

        Yup, long term contracts only benefit them. It locks the customer in, and if the customer can’t follow through, they can go after them for breach, and still have the ability to sell to others and recover their costs. It’s basically a win-win for suppliers.

    • Brave Little Hitachi Wand@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      I bought 32gb DDR5 four months ago at crazy prices, and those two sticks have done better than any stocks I’ve bought in the last year.

  • kossa@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Hoping to bring people, who are holding back, to buy now, before the bubble bursts and memory is dirt cheap, huh?