• Echo Dot@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    Free speech just protect you from the government, gone out of the window anyway as of late.

    But even when free speech wasn’t forced it wouldn’t force channels to carry your advertisement.

    • zarkanian@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      No, the First Amendment only protects you from the government. “Free speech” is a philosophical principle which has nothing to do with governments directly.

      However, an “advertising standards board” that decides what can and cannot be posted publicly sounds pretty governmental to me.

      But even when free speech wasn’t forced it wouldn’t force channels to carry your advertisement.

      Of course, but that still isn’t any kind of universal standards board, that’s individual channels deciding independently.

      • cowfodder@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        3 days ago

        Imagine commenting this on a comment discussing how an entire retailer is boycotting one of the companies involved.

        • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          Yes, the company that made the ad. Unless something happened that I’m not aware of, nothing has happened to the marketing firm who made the ad nor the various companies who served the ad to audiences.

          The question was phrased in a way asking if an ad platform ran it across their standards and practices to see if the ad should be aired. The ad was in poor taste, but it could be shown on network television so no one stopped it. The risk for showing a controversial ad is near zero. The only company dealing with a boycott is the company that was advertising its product.