he highest-ranking officer in the U.S. military says there are no plans to send troops to polling places during November’s midterm congressional elections, addressing concerns among Democrats that the Trump administration could use the military to interfere with the vote.

Gen. Dan Caine, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, made the statement in a letter to Michigan Democratic Sen. Elissa Slotkin, who recently asked Caine and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth to confirm they won’t send troops to the polls.

“The Joint Force has no plans to send Federal military personnel or Federalized members of the National Guard to polling places during the 2026 elections,” Caine said in the letter to Slotkin, which was obtained Monday by The Associated Press. “Likewise, the Joint Force has no plans to use such personnel to seize ballots, voting machines, or other election-related material.”

  • hoppeduponcoffee@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    2 days ago

    They have no plans until he invokes the insurrection act and declares martial law.

    Don’t be fooled by this shit, stay on your toes.

    • Godric@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      “I have neither received nor anticipate receiving any unlawful order concerning the role of the Joint Force in the upcoming November 2026 midterm elections.”

    • cattywampas@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      38
      ·
      2 days ago

      “Martial law” is the leftist version of the rapture. Always on the horizon yet never happens. I was told martial law would be declared 3 or 4 times by now.

      Save this comment and come back in two years because martial law is not happening during this administration or any other.

      • GreenBeard@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        2 days ago

        Sorry, you get no benefit of the doubt with the “It’ll never happen” line. We’ve lost rights and freedoms every day this dunce cap has been in power that Republicans swore up and down would “never happen” and then they did it. This president wouldn’t think twice about nuking American if he thought it would benefit him personally, he would absolutely declare martial law to save his own hide.

        • cattywampas@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          12
          ·
          2 days ago

          Declaring nationwide martial law is not a thing in the United States. It’s just not possible because there are too many of us. We’re too big as a population and too big of a country and there aren’t enough active military members to hold a country of this size with this many weapons.

          There’s also no judicial infrastructure to do it. Martial law is the suspension of civilian law. It means no civilian courts, no Congress, no habeas corpus. It means everyone is being arrested by the military and tried by military tribunals. They fired so many people at the Pentagon that there wouldn’t be enough courts to hold us all.

          People love to throw that term around because it’s always on the horizon and never comes, therefore we can always be scared of it. But it’s irrelevant. ICE has what, a $10 billion budget? It’s not martial law, yet we have these goons on the streets going after people. But does it make you feel any better because it’s not the buzzword we’re afraid of? Probably not.

          • GreenBeard@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            2 days ago

            Arguing it’s logistically impossible may be true, but that doesn’t mean they won’t try. This administration doesn’t seem to care one whit that what they’re trying to do is physically or logically impossible, and they have no regard for due process or the rule of law either. There is no adult in the room, and if it ends in bloody chaos and civil breakdown, so be it. They are banking on people being too passive to do anything about it. Relying on good sense and rational self-interest is absolutely foolish here.

      • HumanOnEarth@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Ahhhh you’re one of those “the midterms are coming to save us” people.

        All I want for Christmas is a brain complacent and ignorant enough to feel that way. Even just for a few days.

            • cattywampas@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              9
              ·
              2 days ago

              My point is that 99% of Lemmy users ain’t gonna do a thing except shitposting and maybe voting at most. Although most will just say things behind a screen like “wow that’s cute you think voting works” or “well I can’t say what my plans actually are because I’ll get banned” which is a very convenient copout.

              I bet dollars to donuts that almost nobody here is a poll worker, nobody is organizing, nobody is canvassing for their preferred candidate, knocking on doors, making phone calls, nothing. And certainly they’d be the last to get off the couch if and when shit popped off for real. Because when times get tough the ones who do the fighting are the ones who were hitting the streets before it got to that point.

              • HumanOnEarth@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                7
                ·
                2 days ago

                That’s a lot of presumptions to build an argument.

                I don’t think you’re wrong about the complacency, but if I’m not mistaken we’re not talking about the fact no one is engaging with the political process. We’re talking about the political process being either a facade or just irrelevant.

                If the election is free and fair:

                Republicans win overall = MAGA in control Democrats win overall = MAGA claims fraud, ignores results

                If the election is screwed with, which obviously it is:

                Republicans win overall = MAGA in control Democrats win overall = lol

                Please, suggest what you think would happen if a Democrat landslide occurs in November? MAGA just accepts democracy and moves on? Lol.

                • cattywampas@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  5
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  Democrat landslides have been happening the past two years. Look at the election results at all levels from school boards to state houses to Congress. If they were going to rig elections they would and should have done so already, because those races matter a lot even if they aren’t part of the midterms.

                  I’m assuming you’re in Canada based on your instance, so let me tell you this: nobody who is a poll worker in the US has ever said that elections are rigged. I’d tell you to sign up today if you were in the US.

      • hoppeduponcoffee@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        How’s the sand tasting? You seem to have your head buried in it.

        The executive branch currently owns the judiciary. They follow his orders. Any resistance is temporary and just for show.

        This has been done before in other countries, where liberal democracies have fallen to dictatorships.

        If it comes to pass, you won’t mind because it hurts the people you’re against. It gives you convenient scapegoats for the economic frustrations you feel, even though they’re being exacerbated by capitalism and this corrupt administration. Just like everyone else who enables this shit, you tell us there’s nothing to worry about until it actually happens.

        Even though it’s not technically “martial law,” as in the military doesn’t control the government, Trump will simply utilize the Insurrection Act to take control of the National Guard, after contesting or negating elections results under the pretense of a “National Emergency.”

        SCOTUS is there to simply sign off on whatever Trump wants. He handpicked obedient loyalists to take the majority vote.

        Hesgeth is on a quest to fire dissident military officials and replace them with Trump loyalists.

        Trump has been successful thus far in steamrolling right over democratic institutions with zero accountability for his actions. Sternly-worded court orders and warnings aren’t going to stop this administration. A GOP-controlled Congress and SCOTUS will stand idly by and let him have his way. The hypocrisy of claiming to love liberty and the constitution while consistently violating both of those things.

        https://www.jurist.org/commentary/2025/09/federal-force-and-the-specter-of-martial-law-a-cautionary-tale/

        https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2025/10/trump-news-judges-warning-martial-law.html

        https://www.counterpunch.org/2025/09/12/is-martial-law-coming-next/

        https://www.americanprogress.org/article/the-dangers-of-project-2025-global-lessons-in-authoritarianism/

        https://www.phillyvoice.com/everyone-comparing-donald-trump-wrong-fascist/

        https://www.nytimes.com/2026/08/28/us/politics/hegseth-blocks-army-promotions.html

        https://m.beforeitsnews.com/libertarian/2026/08/northcom-conplan-3900-a-prelude-to-insurrection-act-invocation-2851426.html

        This is all centrist media by the way, and one article by a libertarian think tank, and you all love to claim your own warped interpretation of “free-market” libertarianism in support of fascism.

        • cattywampas@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          2 days ago

          My guy, the national guard was already sent into states without their request. And where are they now?

          • hoppeduponcoffee@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            Actually, they’re still patrolling DC.

            Have you heard of legal precedent? It’s already been done. Trump has paved the way to do it repeatedly with zero obstruction. His test of the legal system was successful. The legal system has failed to stop him thus far. Any appeals at the federal level are just waiting to be dismissed by SCOTUS.

            He’s already violated international law and invaded Venezuela, installing a puppet regime under false pretenses. He started an unjustified war with Iran. He has plans to invade Greenland and Cuba. He knows no limits and laws will not stop his agenda.

            Are we expecting a GOP-controlled Congress to suddenly grow a conscience and stop him before the election? And how will they stop him? Finger-wagging? The only thing he will respect is force.

            • cattywampas@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              9
              ·
              2 days ago

              DC is a special case because it’s not a state. The legal precedent is now working against them in this situation, because it was dubious whether it was legal when they were first deployed to places like California and Illinois and courts have now ruled that it was not, so now there is no NG in those states that have not requested them.

              • hoppeduponcoffee@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                7
                ·
                2 days ago

                Cool, he can override all that by invoking the Insurrection Act. I don’t see any motions at the federal level to restrict that power.

                And WTH is the rationale to keep the NG actively deployed in DC? They’re not a LE agency. Simple… it’s to terrorize citizens into silence and submission under the false pretense of a “crisis.”

                Just like the false pretense to use ICE to suppress the “massive wave of invaders.”

                • cattywampas@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  6
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  You’re arguing at the same time that legal precedent both does and doesn’t matter based on how it fits your argument.

    • hoppeduponcoffee@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 days ago

      I’m really starting to believe Harambe’s death shifted us into a parallel timeline.

      But then I remember this has been the conservatives ultimate aim since the 1950’s reaction against New Deal policies, civil rights and the political boogeymen of McCarthyism. It was made worse in the 1960s when conservative politicians allied with bible thumpers.

    • ripcord@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      No, in this case there is definitely a plan.

      I’ll be generous and say that this General might even not know about them yet.

  • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    I guess we are all supposed to be relieved, somehow. Even though the fact that this is even a question is beyond fucked up.

  • bedwyr@piefed.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    I wasn’t even considering that to be a possibility until out of the blue the army’s chiefs are like, we totally do not plan on cooperating on a military coup to fix your elections for the gangster in charge.

    Now though, huh.

    I am joking though because I absolutely did consider that, he floated the idea of doing that in 2020 through that traitor general flynn. Not the one on the call with the army when they refused to back up the capital on 1/6 until it was clear the coup would fail, that’s his brother, no the other flynn that is public facing.