• Hawke@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    3 days ago

    just when you think “Pants” is just “Pantsu” you actually just said “underwear” in Japanese.

    To be fair, that’s also the case in English.

    • darthelmet@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      3 days ago

      Yeah but I’ve never heard anyone use it that way. I don’t think anyone would mistake you for talking about underwear in most scenarios.

      • Charzard4261@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        3 days ago

        I wonder when American and English diverged on the meaning of pants, because it very much means underwear over here. Although with how prevalent American TV is (and I guess influencers are these days) people have no problem understanding what you mean… But we’ll have a laugh over it!

        • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          Id guess sometime in the 1800s when certain types of clothes layering became common, more specifically chaps. The jump from pants meaning underwear to pants equals under chaps wear isn’t that far.

      • wylinka@szmer.info
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        3 days ago

        I live in Scotland and I was very confused when my friend from America visited and they were like “it’s hot, can I take off my pants” .__.

      • farmgineer@nord.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        3 days ago

        Pants in British English (and probably more) more often carries the meaning of underpants.