A bill like this would normally get called a ban in all but name; but since it is literally called the “Gender Delusion Disqualification Act”, it is, in essence, a ban in name as well.
A bill like this would normally get called a ban in all but name; but since it is literally called the “Gender Delusion Disqualification Act”, it is, in essence, a ban in name as well.
“reliable witness” here are pilots, many years after the events took place. Sure, I expect them to be good at flying, and identifying enemy aircraft while flying, but they also make mistakes. Do you know how many doctors have falsely identified things in a body? They’re trained a lot more, and a body is significantly more consistent than literally everything in the air.
From what I’ve seen, basically all of the recordings are consistent with an object moving slowly in the air closer than what the pilot thinks. This makes small movements, or just the aircraft movements, appear faster. Hologram technology is not a logical explanation.
It is well documented, there are multiple multiple instances, caught on camera verified by pilots, and a great number of witnesses.
Your explanation doesn’t fit, at all, and you haven’t read the evidence closely enough clearly.
Sorry, but I have. There’s no need for extraordinary explanations. Every one of the events can be explained by ordinary means. People just want it to be something else.
If you’re interested Mick West is a great resource.
Do the Gimbal video and Commander David Fravor’s tic tac, which were released by the DoD as part of its UAP stuff, have no need for extraordinary?