inari@piefed.zip to Microblog Memes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agoRatGPTmedia.piefed.zipimagemessage-square208linkfedilinkarrow-up1652arrow-down119
arrow-up1633arrow-down1imageRatGPTmedia.piefed.zipinari@piefed.zip to Microblog Memes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square208linkfedilink
minus-squarechisel@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down2·1 day agoFor a work email connected to a work LLM, where you don’t particularly care about the privacy implications, LLMs are objectively vastly superior to built-in email search functionality. Especially Outlook.
minus-squareCommanderCloon@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·5 hours agoThey said write access, not read
minus-squareNocturnalMorning@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8arrow-down1·1 day agoReally? That’s a surprising find. Bcz all of the search features I used to use got significantly worse once LLMs were introduced.
minus-squarestarman2112@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·20 hours agoThere are some genuine use cases for LLMs. Finding relevant topics of discussion is one of them
minus-squareAwooooooga@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·3 hours agoIt’s amazing how many people deny how useful the technology is simply because they don’t like it.
minus-squareragebutt@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·1 day agoThat can theoretically be done with read only access
For a work email connected to a work LLM, where you don’t particularly care about the privacy implications, LLMs are objectively vastly superior to built-in email search functionality. Especially Outlook.
They said write access, not read
Really? That’s a surprising find. Bcz all of the search features I used to use got significantly worse once LLMs were introduced.
There are some genuine use cases for LLMs. Finding relevant topics of discussion is one of them
It’s amazing how many people deny how useful the technology is simply because they don’t like it.
That can theoretically be done with read only access