• iamthetot@piefed.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 hours ago

    I’m not sure if this is meant to be a refutation, so apologies if I misinterpreted. But cut jobs to buy hardware sounds to me like jobs lost due to AI, no?

    • roofuskit@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      AI isn’t replacing those jobs. Those jobs were lost to fund speculation. AI isn’t doing their jobs, their former coworkers are doing more work. It’s an important distinction. Those salaries are funding things that don’t exist yet, so the workers couldn’t have been replaced by them.

      • iamthetot@piefed.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 hours ago

        It feels like a distinction no one is strictly trying to make in this thread, to me. The OP picture says AI has made us unemployed. Commenter at top of chain says it has, and provided a source to show job loss due to AI.

        I mean, I just don’t think the people who have lost their jobs due to AI care much if it was because the AI directly replaced them or just made their former coworker more efficient.

        • roofuskit@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          It matters very much whenever discussing AI, as to whether AI is actually performing the jobs of workers who lost their jobs. There’s a very powerful marketing machine at work which is partially responsible for convincing businesses to make these speculative moves. Speculation and a bubble are killing jobs. “AI” is by and large is not replacing workers.