• schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    143
    ·
    12 hours ago

    US: Let’s sanction everyone everywhere all at once!

    Also US: Why don’t people want to be dependent on US systems? 😭

    • Ech@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Couldn’t undermine the country more if they tried, which makes one wonder.

      • Jaysyn@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        34
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Yep. Trump’s actions are no different than what any bad actor would do if they wanted to destroy the USA without invading it.

        • Destroy our soft power… check!
        • Turn allies against us… check!
        • Destroy our economy… check!
        • Drastically weaken our military… check!
    • CIA_chatbot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      43
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Yea we got a bit of the “inmates are running the asylum” situation over here.

      In the immortal words of the joke (paraphrased) this country needs an enema

    • benjirenji@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      I wish. Organizations and countries/municipalities are far too lazy to make the change.

      • shalafi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        9 hours ago

        The time and money involved are both staggering. This isn’t about you switching operating systems on your personal laptop.

        Where are you going to get support staff anytime soon? All those Windows admins magically switching to Linux overnight?

        Hell, Linux offers nothing remotely comparable to the power of Active Directory. That alone will keep Windows in the lead.

        And more. This isn’t about lazy.

        • The_v@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Time + motivation + money can overcome a lot of obstacles. It also helps that template of what is needed already exists in Active Directory. This changes the project from “innovating something new” to “a slightly better copy” and is usually a lot faster and easier.

          All copyright/patents are also void because of the sanctions at least in practice.

        • Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 hours ago

          I have worked in big company where linux and windows coexisted, but we were developers so maybe that’s why (IT was very strict though).

          • timbuck2themoon@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 hours ago

            Red hat IDM, aka freeipa.

            Depending on what youre doing you absolutely don’t need active directory.

            Hell, a lot of orgs are just going entra anyway. If you’re using SSO like that or okta or keycloak you likely don’t need AD.

          • SparroHawc@piefed.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            6 hours ago

            At this point, a lot of entities don’t need AD because their entire workflow runs in a web browser, and practically any SSO provider will work.

            That said, accessing actual computer resources can be managed with groups and ACLs. Perhaps not as elegantly or as well-integrated as AD is, but that’s the price you pay.