Politico reports that at a Hamptons fundraiser last Saturday, Cuomo told his well-heeled supporters that, contrary to all available evidence, he could win the New York mayoral race as an independent—because he was likely to have the implicit support of President Donald Trump.
The imperative of defeating Mamdani justified the new coalition Cuomo is trying to create of his die-hard loyalists (who are Democrats) with Trump Republicans.
Some of that latter group might be tempted to back Curtis Sliwa, the actual GOP nominee in the race. Cuomo told these donors, “We can minimize [the Sliwa] vote, because he’ll never be a serious candidate. And Trump himself, as well as top Republicans, will say the goal is to stop Mamdani. And you’ll be wasting your vote on Sliwa.” Cuomo went on to emphasize that he’d be a mayor who could find common ground with Trump:
damn libtards! They’re a bunch of queers!
I don’t understand why you’re downvoted. Do people completely ignore context?
Cause people need to stop using that term full stop. It’s not 2006 any more
It was ironically used as a means to make fun of people who use the term…
Just curious, the word you guys are fighting over us “libtards” or “queers” ?
The
priorformerEdit: am dumbass
I thought it was the former because the person they replied to used “suck off” as a pejorative.
Shit, yeah, the terms former, not prior. I’m a dumbass. I’m perfectly good with queer. The other word needs to die already
They forgot the /s
Sarcasm here is too obvious to be pointed out.
I’ve met plenty of tankies who believe Librulz bad and also that lgbt dont get human rights.
It’s actually a pretty basic stance for them.
Sure, but they wouldn’t have worded it like that.
I don’t pretend they all have some minimal level of tact or subtlety, after all we ourselves certainly don’t: that dude forgot the /s.
You didn’t put the /s