Politico reports that at a Hamptons fundraiser last Saturday, Cuomo told his well-heeled supporters that, contrary to all available evidence, he could win the New York mayoral race as an independent—because he was likely to have the implicit support of President Donald Trump.

The imperative of defeating Mamdani justified the new coalition Cuomo is trying to create of his die-hard loyalists (who are Democrats) with Trump Republicans.

Some of that latter group might be tempted to back Curtis Sliwa, the actual GOP nominee in the race. Cuomo told these donors, “We can minimize [the Sliwa] vote, because he’ll never be a serious candidate. And Trump himself, as well as top Republicans, will say the goal is to stop Mamdani. And you’ll be wasting your vote on Sliwa.” Cuomo went on to emphasize that he’d be a mayor who could find common ground with Trump:

  • Catoblepas@piefed.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Have fun in your feelings I guess, but that doesn’t change that Trump still would have won if everyone voted. There isn’t some group of people that could have turned the tide but withheld their vote to punish you, specifically. More people wanted Trump and that’s why he won.

    Come to terms with the fact this isn’t a problem you can solve by berating and screaming at the people who already know Trump sucks. American society needs to do the long, hard work of actually confronting racism and fascism on the personal as well as the societal level.

    Or do what makes you feel good regardless of what the facts show, I’m not a cop.

    • MourningDove@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      No, he didn’t.

      Some ninety one MILLION people didn’t vote. How many of those idiots do you think we’re in protest of bOtH siDeS?

      And for the record,

      https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cn5w9w160xdo.amp

      Trump is ahead by just over 230,000 votes in Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin, according to the latest numbers from CBS. All three states were the focus of intensive campaigning by both parties ahead of the 5 November vote. If just over 115,000 voters in that group had instead picked Harris, she would have won those Rust Belt swing states, giving her enough votes in the electoral college to win the presidency.

      • nialv7@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        You are saying all those 90 million would have voted Kamala? Dude you are delulu

      • Catoblepas@piefed.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        13 hours ago

        I’ll be happy to continue the conversation when you read the article.

        If you have data better than Pew’s post election analysis, present it.

        • MourningDove@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          13 hours ago

          Trump is ahead by just over 230,000 votes in Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin, according to the latest numbers from CBS. All three states were the focus of intensive campaigning by both parties ahead of the 5 November vote. If just over 115,000 voters in that group had instead picked Harris, she would have won those Rust Belt swing states, giving her enough votes in the electoral college to win the presidency.

          • Catoblepas@piefed.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            12 hours ago

            Articles come with dates. You’ll notice that 2025 is after 2024.

            A CBS poll also isn’t as thorough as Pew.

            • MourningDove@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              12 hours ago

              Ninety one million people didn’t vote. Among them, were protestors, conservatives and democrats, had the democrats and the protestors voted, even counting the republicans, she still would have won. A post-election survey doesn’t tell you shit aside from how many people want to have it known that they would have won if they bothered to bet.

              End of story.

              • Catoblepas@piefed.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                edit-2
                12 hours ago

                So essentially you’re mad that Pew’s data shows there was no realistic path to Harris winning, because theoretically every conservative could have stayed home and everyone else could have voted, and actually they were all probably lying about liking Trump, and also Pew just happened to randomly select people that would lie about liking Trump. If it hadn’t been for them Harris would have definitely won!! Even though 2024 had the second highest turnout in over a century (again, something you might know if you read the article).

                This sure sounds like a lot of hoops to jump through for the result to be that the Democratic Party didn’t fuck up. I’m sure screaming at and berating the people already opposed to Trump will win you more votes next time, though. It worked so well last time! That’s a lot less scary than dismantling racism and fascism in your own community and gives you that nice, sanctimonious high.

                • MourningDove@lemmy.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  12 hours ago

                  lol… again… a post election survey of what people would have done- isn’t an accurate reading of anything at all.

                  It’s a guess. A trust placed in people that were too fucking stupid to do the right thing the first time.

                  But by all means, keep propping up this nonsense as an argument against having to be responsible for something. And the irony of you calling me sanctimonious.

                  I voted.

                  • Catoblepas@piefed.blahaj.zone
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    12 hours ago

                    I never accused you of not voting, and I voted too (Democratic ticket all the way down in a blue state).

                    The fact you think you can divine who voted based on how hard they jack off the Democratic establishment is why you aren’t and won’t be having useful or productive conversations with anyone who isn’t already in lockstep with you. You’re having your two minutes’ hate, not getting anyone new to vote against Trump.