• kossa@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Check up on the social credit score

    There have been widespread misconceptions in media reports about a unified social credit “score” based on individuals’ behavior, leading to punishments if the score is too low or rewards if the score is high.

    • redballooon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      19 hours ago

      The social credit system is a broad governance strategy to track businesses, individuals, and government institutions and enhance their perceived trustworthiness rather than a single system

      Awesome, just a broad strategy, not yet a single unified system. There’s still a chance to escape specific punishments.

        • redballooon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          10 hours ago

          Dude what’s the point of a system that enforces behavior when there’s no punishment?

          • kossa@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            10 hours ago

            The punishment is having a bad monetary credit score. Like with credit score all over the world. There’s nothing more sinister about the Chinese system than anywhere else, where credit scores are a thing. Granted, credit scores, especially for private persons, are pretty sinister in the first place.

            What let to this misconception about social credit in China is that there were people suggesting to extend it to more general behavior. You can find people everywhere suggesting crazy shit. Like just this week a part of the conservative party in Germany suggested using the army against protests, but nobody is drawing the conclusion that Germany is preparing Tiananmen 2.0 in the capital. It was lunatics suggesting it anyway.