• pimento64@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      No, ublock origin actually has specialized features that in-browser adblockers don’t replicate.

            • pimento64@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              7 hours ago

              You need sources that a browser extension has more features than a browser’s built-in feature? This is not debate club. Point your eyeballs at the screen.

              • artyom@piefed.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                7 hours ago

                What “screen”?

                If you don’t want to provide sources, that’s your prerogative. But don’t expect not to be treated like a fool for it.

            • webghost0101@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              21 hours ago

              Not the person you replied to but copied directly from https://ublockorigin.com/

              Lite vs. full uBlock Origin

              Choose Lite when…

              • You use current Chrome or Safari.
              • You want filtering modes with relatively little setup.
              • Its browser-supported filters cover the sites you visit.

              Choose full uBO when…

              • You use Firefox on desktop or Android.
              • You need dynamic filtering, the request logger, or advanced per-site controls.
              • You rely on filter syntax that Lite cannot support.
              • artyom@piefed.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                19 hours ago

                I don’t know what that has to do with the conversation. For the third time, we’re talking about a native implementation. Not an extension.

                • webghost0101@sopuli.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  11 hours ago

                  This seems to be a bit of a miscommunication. But an extension is not native. And all versions of Ubo are extensions, something else doesnt exist.

                  You can define native a few different ways in english language so i get how it might be confusing if its not your first, but its similar to how a mod for a game is not native to the game.

                  When you mentioned “native adblock in chromium” That does exists and it requires no extension. But they are never as fully featured as the full Ubo extension which only works on firefox. Which is what this comparison is about.

                  I hope that helps.

                  • artyom@piefed.social
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    7 hours ago

                    When you mentioned “native adblock in chromium” That does exists and it requires no extension.

                    Yes. That’s what I’m referring to when I said 3 times that it’s not an extension.

                    But they are never as fully featured as the full Ubo extension

                    But it is. It’s the exact same functionality, built into the browser, natively.

      • artyom@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        It’s not impossible. mv3 pertains to extensions and, as I said, it’s not an extension, it’s built natively into the browser.