“I’ve made clear from the very beginning that our top priority is going to be to drive down the high cost of living,” the House minority leader said on Fox News Sunday.
“I’ve made clear from the very beginning that our top priority is going to be to drive down the high cost of living,” the House minority leader said on Fox News Sunday.
So attempt to get MULTIPLE supermajorities to enact laws… Or get 1 supermajority to impeach/convict.
We don’t know, what we don’t know. Either of us could be correct, but I don’t think anyone really knows what’s going to happen.
Edit: it seemed like you didn’t understand me, because you specified conviction, not trying to be combative, just wanted to be on the same page
Yep, pretty much! Right now I agree with Kiros that focusing on impeachment as an immediate concern is likely to be a poor use of resources, as bipartisan support that hits or surpasses a supermajority for legislation is relatively common compared to the ouster of a president. But I am just guessing that that’s the most reasonable approach, as you say anyone could be right at the moment.