Opponents say [Washington state] voters were persuaded at least partly because the initiative and its boosters exploited deep-seated prejudices and misunderstandings about transgender people to erode their rights.

  • Phanlix@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Aw, you mad bro? Yeah this isn’t about your feelings at all is it.

    We’ve been talking over the same study for like 10 comments, I can tell by your reading level you’re not capable of understanding that because of my educational and professional background I have some differing opinions on the conclusions of those involved with the study, and I’m allowed to. Thankfully voters agreed with me more, and those same leagues you want to dictate things have pretty universally applied anti-trans rules. So I think despite you whining and crying about what you want, you’re not gonna get it.

    • Cherries@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      That’s a whole lotta words to say you have no data. Your strongest argument so far has been to call me a meaniebobeanie.

      It’s absurd that you claim to be a trans ally while advocating the government ban them from participating in society based solely on your opinions and not the scientific consensus. I’m sure once transgender people become more widely accepted, you’ll quietly pretend you were always an advocate, the same way bigots pretend to do about gay people and black people.

      • Phanlix@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Nah my strongest argument so far has been the study’s own results which proves there is a difference, and a trans person can’t fully change sex. They’re still biologically male or female.