• UltraBlack@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Bruh and you are one of those annoying vegans that do nothing but tell everybody how terrible meat is.

      I get it but people like you are just annoying as hell

      • SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        20 hours ago

        While their marketing slogan of “eat the rich” is very good, it should be noted that it is not recommended as a sustained diet, as they are very often quite high in fats and full of preservatives and bad chemicals

    • DeadMartyr@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      22 hours ago

      I’m pretty sure a more useful measure of this is calories per unit of water than straight weight/mass. Which tbf is a metric meat will probably still be less efficient by.

      There’s also like multiple factors of this, if you’re growing meat at industrial scale then you are farming crops specifically to feed the cattle so its doubly wasteful; but not everything is like beef, goats grazing on mountains where you can’t plant crops easily can feed a family with minimal labor, and they produce more than just meat. Ideally you wouldnt be raising cattle for just the meat.

      • lookingforanALFpolycule@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        20 hours ago

        Soy yields roughly 2,12 calories per liter of water, whereas flesh yields about 0,16 calories per liter of water.

        Your other comments are more about animal agriculture and not about water usage (which is what this post is about) but to address all of your arguments I will say that I think it is wrong to cage, impregnate and kill others for the simple fact that they experience the world just like you and me in all the ways that matter to whether it’s ethical to be inflicting these things on them.

        • DeadMartyr@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          I think the line is kind of arbitrary where people care for animals in regards to how equal to treat them to humans. Like you can argue an ant also “experiences the world”, hell even coral are technically animals. I dont think that reasoning works unless you literally think every insect is equivalent to a full grown human–which is ludicrous to basically anyone today and we will just never agree if thats the case.

          I think if someone is there torturing a cow just for amusement then that is obviously sadistic and wrong, but if someone is raising them as a livelihood or to feed their family then I dont think its wrong to one day eat them.

          Also this is coming from someone who loves animals and would care for injured crows and things. I’ve grown attached to chickens and named them–I still went and wrung out their neck when it was time for them to reach my family’s dinner plate.

          Like you can raise animals humanely, and I believe you can do so sustainably in places where people have deemed unfeasible for planting crops.

    • NonconfrontationaI@lemmy.mlBanned from community
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Lmao. If I eat a kg of delicious flesh a week that’s only 15L?

      Way better than I thought, tbh. Plus what about if I go in the woods and sustainably hunt an invasive species? I’ve helped the natural environment, and ethically sourced 200lbs of meat.

        • NonconfrontationaI@lemmy.mlBanned from community
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          20 hours ago

          Sorry, a species introduced by humans that’s turned out to be an ecological disaster.

          Any thoughts on the morality there?

          • lookingforanALFpolycule@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            16 hours ago

            I feel like if you’d argue to make an invasive species less fertile I could maybe agree but you seem to be arguing to kill them with the ulterior motive of eating their corpse.

          • debil@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            19 hours ago

            Yes, get rid of humans.

            Fortunately we’ll wipe ourselves out of existence in the not too distant future.

              • debil@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                18 hours ago

                I think we have already started as a species. However, offing oneself is a lazy, fatalistic solution one should not recommend to anyone. Instead I’d suggest trying to find more peace and love in the universe and live happily ever after.