• Flatearth_Habeebi@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    23 hours ago

    With all due respect, this is such a narrow and selfish way of thinking. Allow me to say, it’s really shitty. What a shame.

    • stoy@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      19 hours ago

      And this is why I often hesitate to add an oposing viewpoint to discussions online.

      I am getting downvoted and called out despite simply answering the question.

      And I absolutely disagree with you on calling it narrow and selfish, thoughtless would be the truth.

      I also disagree with calling it “shitty”, for the most part of my life Sweden has not had a drought, no one has been denied access to water due to my actions.

      So this is also thoughtlessness.

      Now the drought situation in Sweden is changing, and I am keeping track of it, so far I have not yet heard about there being risks of drinking water shortages, if that changes, I will change my behavoir. Until that time I will do what I always do when I am working to change something, I’ll work with it slowly and change behavoirs at a resonable pace.

      • AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Yeah and let me disagree with you both

        • it is unnecessarily wasteful
        • but it’s just a drop in a bucket
        • you have no personal incentive to use less water

        For me the keyword is “unnecessarily “: it never occurred to me to waste water like that. But it’s really not much and I wasted more water in other ways.

        Perhaps we need more expensive water so there is personal incentive to use less