Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 1 day ago"Can I open those for you, ma'am?"lemmy.dbzer0.comimagemessage-square105linkfedilinkarrow-up1519arrow-down19
arrow-up1510arrow-down1image"Can I open those for you, ma'am?"lemmy.dbzer0.comViking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 1 day agomessage-square105linkfedilink
minus-squareBrkdncr@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down1·23 hours agoIf there was no charge then everyone would bring their own, and they would have to start charging more for the food to make up for the loss.
minus-squareKangae_Hishiryo@scribe.disroot.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down4·19 hours agoWhat loss? They can lose something that they didn’t had in the first place.
minus-squareBrkdncr@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up6arrow-down1·19 hours agoLike it or not, alcohol sales subsidize their income. The markup is substantial.
minus-squareKangae_Hishiryo@scribe.disroot.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down4·18 hours agoAnd that still doesn’t justifies the literal extortion of their clients.
minus-squareFishFace@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·12 hours agoMate, it’s not extortion because you have the option of not doing it. Look up extortion in a dictionary. Then if you still think it’s wrong, work out why you actually object to it.
If there was no charge then everyone would bring their own, and they would have to start charging more for the food to make up for the loss.
What loss? They can lose something that they didn’t had in the first place.
Like it or not, alcohol sales subsidize their income. The markup is substantial.
And that still doesn’t justifies the literal extortion of their clients.
Mate, it’s not extortion because you have the option of not doing it. Look up extortion in a dictionary.
Then if you still think it’s wrong, work out why you actually object to it.
Yes it does?
not if they just say no.