• cryptix@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Without play service this won’t get enforced right? Or will graphine os be affected? Its an monopoly power play anyways.

  • rdri@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Is there any explanation why this will be effective? Like, “if we find a malware app, we will do this and that to the author’s personal data, and it will help you in that way” etc.

      • rdri@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Should that help people who were unfortunate to install that malware before the dev is banned? Also how exactly do they hope to identify the dev as already banned if he tries to register again?

        • ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 hours ago

          Should that help people who were unfortunate to install that malware before the dev is banned?

          It doesn’t say but it would make sense to check the certs periodically and not just on install.

          Also how exactly do they hope to identify the dev as already banned if he tries to register again?

            • ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              9 hours ago

              How online banks like Revolut do it? How crypto exchanges do it? How Google’s age verification does it? I guess they will do the same.

              • rdri@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                28 minutes ago

                Don’t know about age verification, but revolut and crypto likely require manual review. I can’t imagine google relying on the same process and assuming it will help to deter malicious actors.

  • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    1 day ago

    Whatever the hell I do outside the playstore is none of Googles business and though this too is handwaved away by claiming improved security, we all know this has fuck all to do with security.

    This is just again Google being a monopoly and wanting to stay that way by pushing out other developers

    I guarantee you that newpipe devs will not be able to get verified, and now Google can block yet another app

    Fuck. google. (Also apple and gicrosoft

      • Seefra 1@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        16 hours ago

        You know that not everyone can shell out 400 Euros on a phone, right?

        • shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          12 hours ago

          Then make sure your next device is capable of running linear joes without Google Play services before you purchase it.

          These days I do not make a phone purchase without making sure it will run lineage OS first.

          • Seefra 1@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 hours ago

            I did my research before buying my current phone, but turned out all phones that could run lineage OS were too expensive, not a single affordable phone was supported. (With the exception of really super old discontinued models that are too slow to even open a webpage and battery past it’s useful life)

            • shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              11 hours ago

              When I purchased my device in 2023, I purchased the OnePlus Nord N200 5G, which was released in 2021, brand new in the box, because it supported Lineage OS, and I’m still using it today.

              It’s because I only charge my phone between 30 and 80%. It still has less than 400 charge cycles on the battery. And so I’m basically using a 4-year-old device as a 2-year-old device and it still works fine with lineage OS.

              I also paid $300 for it brand new in the box.

              • Seefra 1@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                11 hours ago

                Unfortunately $300 is still the double if what I’m willing to pay for a phone, I paid 150 for my spyware phone, and while I hate the lack of privacy and freedom such device provides, it does everything I need it to do with the apps from f-droid. I just don’t use it for anything that requires secrecy.

                I guess I will just stop updating when the new “feature” rolls out and see what happens.

                • shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  11 hours ago

                  Yeah, I’m not sure just how low of a device you can get and get Lineage OS on it. I know that I generally don’t pay less than about 300 for devices because otherwise they get too slow for my use case.

                  I definitely don’t need a $700 device or above, but 300 to about 400 is my sweet spot.

        • eleitl@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          14 hours ago

          Buy on sale and used. That’s on par with chinese hardware.

          • Seefra 1@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            13 hours ago

            Tried, but at least in Europe the only cheap pixels I could find were old unsupported ones where the batteries where probably either dead or dying.

            • eleitl@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 hours ago

              Paid 335 eur for Pixel 7a new last December on Amazon Germany. Not cheap, but GOS was worth it.

        • astropenguin5@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          16 hours ago

          Graphene should be able to run on anything they can run android though? Not sure what you mean

          • Seefra 1@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            16 hours ago

            What? Graphene OS only runs on Google Pixel devices.

            Even ROMs with wider hardware support like Lineage OS only run on expensive devices too (Or very old discontinued ones that you can’t find anywhere and have no firmware or kernel updates).

          • PieMePlenty@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            15 hours ago

            Run? Probably. Work flawlessly? Questionable. It needs to be built (as with every OS update) for every specific device. The developers only do builds for pixel devices (faq). You can take the source and build it for your device. I have no idea how you’d even begin to do that or what that would entail, but most probably, you’d to be able to add drivers for things like fingerprint sensors or cameras unless you are ok with losing access to some functionalities.

            My understanding is that phones are hard to support with one “do all” operating system. Thats why all manufacturers take AOSP and modify it with their own code - specific to each device and make builds for each. A bit different mentality to what we do on PCs, where one build of an operating system will just work everywhere.

    • cmhe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      15 hours ago

      This isn’t about you.

      Also this kind of liberal argument of, ‘The gestapo cannot catch me because I bought skates!’ is stupid and tiring.

      • eleitl@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        14 hours ago

        It is precisely about me and a small group of technical users who care about freedom. The rest of the users, that’s strictly their own problem. If the gestapo outlaws skates and I can’t get them on the black market and the society is fine with concentration camps that’s also allright. I’m too old to care.

    • Xtreix@infosec.exchange
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      15 hours ago

      @wordmark @Pro It is not GrapheneOS that only supports Pixel phones; it is other Android devices that do not meet the standard security requirements of the GrapheneOS project.

      GrapheneOS is a project focused on privacy and security on mobile devices. The devices supported by the project must use all standard security features, maintain firmware security updates, etc. This is part of what sets GrapheneOS apart from other projects that claim to be concerned with security and privacy, but are essentially just engaging in misleading marketing.

      Here is the list of requirements for a mobile device to be officially compatible with GrapheneOS :

      https://grapheneos.org/faq#future-devices

      For now, only Pixel phones meet these requirements.

      Since GrapheneOS is open-source, it is technically possible to build it yourself on an unsupported device, but you will not get an official version of GrapheneOS and you will not get support if you encounter problems. If GrapheneOS is running on an end-of-life device that no longer receives security updates, it doesn’t matter if it’s GrapheneOS, it’s not secure.

      GrapheneOS is currently working with an OEM/ODM to offer a few devices that are natively compatible with GrapheneOS.

  • MangoPenguin@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 day ago

    Their ‘verified’ app store already has tons of fake malware apps being distributed on it, maybe they should clean up their act first.

  • katy ✨@piefed.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    23 hours ago

    and what happens for trans ppl who live in areas that make it impossible to get a matching id google? fuck off with this “we’re protecting you” bullshit

  • Asafum@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    1 day ago

    I’m sure the newpipe devs are going to coincidentally not be allowed to be verified… Oops no YouTube viewer… Ughhh…

      • TheFrirish@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        16 hours ago

        As a backup I have installed YouTube as a PWA (added to home screen) from Fennec and installed uBlock, YouTube HD and Sponsorblock. It’s good I even get recommendations but not as straightforward as NewPipe

    • pdxfed@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      1 day ago

      Remember, it’s important that technology and advancement only be used by capital, never by the underclass.

      • Notso@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 day ago

        Yeah, imagine a world where plebs had control over and ownership of the devices they use… (shudders)

  • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 day ago

    OK, this sounds problematic. I don’t see any obvious language for opting out and it doesn’t seem there’s intent to opt out. There’s probably going to be a dev option to allow it but that would probably still make installing from sources like F-Droid impractical.

    • WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      there is already a dev option that users need to enable to use fdroid and such, and google wants to change that now. I doubt that they will just add a 2nd dev option, because that wouldn’t change anything.

      • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        It’s not a dev option at the moment. It’s a permission setting and it doesn’t require enabling developer options.