• Chaotic Entropy@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    Firefox really does seem to have lost the plot… they don’t seem to go five minutes without slamming their dick in another drawer. It starts to look like they’re in to it.

    • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago

      I never trusted them. Who would ever set up a nonprofit owned by a for profit company if not to decieve people?

      I do appreciate the Open Sourced GECKO engine, though. I like Waterfox.

      • The_Decryptor@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        a nonprofit owned by a for profit company

        It’s the other way around, the foundation owns the corporation.

        Still feels like the corporation is the one making decisions though.

  • 58008@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    Literally no one on this green earth asked for this shit. In fact, we’ve been pretty direct about how much we don’t want it.

    It’s exhausting.

    • Swordgeek@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      Mozilla has stopped working on developing and improving their products, and is now entirely focused on adding trendy terms and garbage, to feed money to their C*Os.

      • michaelmrose@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        They in the last year or so added built in vertical tabs , much better hardware support for decoding video on Linux, continue to support manifest v2 and high quality ad blocking. Have increased performance and memory usage.

        In the last 7 years performance is night and day different as is multiple process performance and switched away from unmaintainable old broken addon system.

        They also created one of the premiere programming languages which is making in roads in the Linux kernel.

    • Semicolon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      There is none, this is all AI=bad knee-jerk reaction. From what I can tell, so far Firefox has 3 ML-based systems implemented:

      • Site / text translation - fully local, small model, requires manual action from user
      • Tab grouping suggestions - fully local, small model, requires manual action from user
      • Image alt text generation (when adding images to a PDF) - fully local, small model, looks like it’s enabled by default but can be turned off directly in the modal that appears when adding alt text

      All of these models are small enough to be quickly run locally on mobile devices with minimal wait time. The CPU spikes appear to be a bug in the inference module implementation - not an intended behavior.

      Firefox also provides UI for connecting to cloud-based chatbots on a sidebar, but they need to be manually enabled to be used. The sidebar is also customizable so anyone who doesn’t want this button there can just remove it. There’s also a setting in about:config that removes it harder.

      I actually really like the way Mozilla is introducing these features. I recently had to visit another country’s post office site and having the ability to just instantly translate it directly on my device is great.

  • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    The pathological need to find something to use LLMs for is so bizzare.

    It’s like the opposite of classic ML, relatively tiny special purpose models trained for something critical, out of desperation, because it just can’t be done well conventionally.

    But this:

    AI-enhanced tab groups. Powered by a local AI model, these groups identify related tabs and suggest names for them. There is even a “Suggest more tabs for group” button that users can click to get recommendations.

    Take out the word AI.

    Enhanced tab groups. Powered by a local algorithm, these groups identify related tabs and suggest names for them. There is even a “Suggest more tabs for group” button that users can click to get recommendations.

    If this feature took, say, a gigabyte of RAM and a bunch of CPU, it would be laughed out. But somehow it ships because it has the word AI in it? That makes no sense.

    I am a massive local LLM advocate. I like “generative” ML, within reason and ethics. But this is just stupid.

    • DaddleDew@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      When I’m browsing around with multiple tabs open, the last thing I want is something to start moving them around and messing my flow up. This is a solution looking for a problem.

    • acosmichippo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 days ago

      even without AI, to me tab groups are already feature creep bloat in browsers. do people really put that much effort into organizing tabs?

      • exu@feditown.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        I like the tab groups. I use them often at work to group an issue with related tabs and my attempts at solving it. Also makes it easier to pause work on one problem and work on something else because I have the tabs grouper and know exactly where to go back.

        • woelkchen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 days ago

          I like the tab groups.

          And nobody should stop you installing an extension that provides tab groups. I agree with the other commentator that some features can be left to extensions and don’t need to be part of the core web browser, though.

          • frongt@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 days ago

            True, but I’m not sure that an extension would have the necessary access to manipulate the browser like that. I don’t think it should. A malicious extension could do horrible things.

            • woelkchen@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 days ago

              I’m not sure that an extension would have the necessary access to manipulate the browser like that.

              I don’t know if they still do but they used to have. That, however, is something to discuss with the genius decision makers at Mozilla who decide to break extension APIs every couple of years. Firefox on Android still hasn’t recovered from last time.

    • Godort@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      The pathological need to find something to use LLMs for is so bizzare.

      Venture capital dumped so much money into the tech without understanding the full scope of what it was capable of. Now they’re so in so deep that they desperately NEED to find something profitable it can do, otherwise they’ll lose the farm.

      • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 days ago

        Firefox has little financial motivation for this, though?

        Other than getting “AI” investor money, if that’s the plan… But otherwise it just feels like they’re following a meme.

        • A Wild Mimic appears!@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 days ago

          90% of their cash flow comes from google to be the default search engine - they are probably trying to open up alternative routes of funding to reduce the risk, since it’s not guaranteed that the money will keep coming due to the current lawsuit.

          • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 days ago

            Right, I sympathize with that.

            …But also it’s ridiculous. Like why should including a feature with “AI” in it get them VC money? Even if that’s kinda reality?

            TBH they should just become a contributor to llama.cpp and market that somehow.

  • Tywèle [she|her]@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    Do you have to enable the feature first? Because I’m on v141 and I don’t see this feature. Complaining about a useless and draining feature that you yourself enabled is a special kind of stupid tbh.

  • Mika@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 days ago

    TBH despite I don’t like this specific idea, nor use Firefox directly, I do like the usage of local inference vs sending your data to thirdparty to do AI.

    They just needed to do it OPT IN, not OPT OUT.