The proposal is an attempt to seize momentum on one of the campaign’s top issues — the housing crisis — and could affect nearly one million homes, or about 40 percent of the city’s rental market.

It’s also part of a continuing attack on the front-runner in the race, Assemblyman Zohran Mamdani, who pays $2,300 a month for a rent-stabilized one-bedroom apartment in Astoria, Queens.

  • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    Unfortunately your example is how it should work in an idealized world:

    "Let’s take an obviously fictitious example of a 2 apartment building that needs $1000 to break even for taxes, mortgage/loan, common utilities, etc.

    If one apartment is rent controlled and you’re only allowed to rent it at $250, then the other must get rented at $750 in order for you to just break even on the property.

    This would be their logic. And it’s not “bad” logic.

    When without rent control you’d see closer to $500 split evenly between both units."

    Without rent control, how it actually works isn’t based on what is needed to break even, it’s “What the market will bear”, i.e. “Whatever I can get away with.”

    So instead of a $500/$500 split, the landlord now lists both apartments at $2,000. If they successfully rent both, they pocket the difference.

    If they rent neither in a reasonable time, they lower the rent until they get the absolute most the market will bear. Maybe it’s $2,000/$1,700. Maybe it’s $1,000/$1,000. It will never be the break even point, because real estate investors aren’t interested in breaking even.