• Buffalox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    16 hours ago

    AFAIK in USA it is pretty common to build the power infra structure as part of the AI data-centers that need it.
    This has already been pretty common for normal data-centers for years.
    USA never really had good public service infra structure for it. While for instance in Denmark many companies build data-centers because Denmark both has good infrastructure, and also can supply data-centers with relatively cheap energy from renewable sources, without the company having to foot a giant bill to invest in that too.

    The American model is of course inferior, but it’s not like it doesn’t work at all, it just makes it more expensive.
    On the other hand, in USA they can bribe White House, and do almost whatever the fuck they want. That is NOT an option in China, where it can result in a literal death penalty for the CEO if tried!

    • fitgse@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      14 hours ago

      For some. But Alabama power has raised rates AGAIN to build another 2 gas plants because of data centers. My power bill has increased by 50% in the last 6 years.

      • Buffalox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        33 minutes ago

        OK so Alabama push the bill to consumers for expanding power to data centers in that situation. Meaning the American AI industry has absolutely nothing to be envious about China for in that situation. Which was kind of my point, contrary to the claims of the article.