Apostrophe placement has no influence on how a word is pronounced; they’re always silent.
An apostrophe is a substitute for omitted letters. It’s “y’all” because the apostrophe is taking the place of the the “ou” in “you all”. “Ya’ll” makes no sense in relation to “you all”.
212 warm / 100 warm
warm
Meme was made by a space shuttle tile.
Turning Point USA chief
Turning Point USA has chiefs? lol
The quad ‘rest of the fire’ images, lol
Doesn’t retroactively make the show any less funny, and this post is not any sort of endorsement of him; if it was, that would at least serve as a reason to comment the way you did, as a response.
This just comes off as empty virtue signaling.
What’s the tax that prevents people from valuing your stuff highly? Because that’s what net worth ultimately is: other people’s valuation of what you own.
Don’t hold your breath for any sort of ‘maximum wealth’ legislation to ever be a thing. It’s an absurd idea on its face, and even if you could accomplish something like that, it wouldn’t solve any of the problems you think it’d solve.
you get everyone a baseline income of $75k is by taking it from the billionaires
Actually, no. That’s a hypothetical for a reason; the entire net worth of all billionaires combined (assuming a magic wand could convert the net worth figure into an equivalent amount of cash, literally impossible in reality) wouldn’t get everyone to $75k for even a single year.
Over the long term, there really isn’t. Outside of a government imposing tyranny-tier control over everyone’s wealth, wealth inequality happens naturally, and inevitably, and the gap widens similarly.
What’s more important is making sure that even the poorest among us can have a decent standard of living. After all, if you waved a magic wand and now everyone in the US, for example, was earning $75,000 a year minimum, no one would be in poverty, right? And yet the size of the ‘wealth gap’ between the wealthiest and the $75k ‘minimum earners’ would effectively be identical; the gap between $0 and billions is basically the same as the gap between $75k and billions.
Toppling the wealthiest just because they’re the wealthiest isn’t going to solve any of the actual problems (especially when politicians get bribed for relatively-measly five figure sums, etc.).
Massive understatement—they’re actually the only things that could truly be “solutions” at all in anything approaching long-term.
There will always be people who are the smartest and/or shrewdest and/or most ambitious and/or luckiest, in a population. “Just get rid of the people who currently have the most wealth” is extraordinarily naive.
The OP says “doesn’t work”, not ‘does work but not enough to satisfy an arbitrary threshold of “working for a living” so it doesn’t count’.
Nobody is saying owners do literally no labor
The OP literally says “doesn’t work”. Is “doesn’t work” not equivalent to “no labor”?
It’s just a running joke for greentexts to call them “fake and gay”, which became having to come up with some justification to attach both labels to the story instead of just saying it is. This is completely regardless of what the greentext actually consists of.
The more you have to stretch to make the labels fit, the funnier it is.
Missing in the post’s title, but not the article’s title. No ambiguity there:
Republican Mayor Wesley Dingus charged after ‘sniffing underage girl’s underwear’ on camera
That’s not quite accurate either, it seems.
I always try to avoid absolute ‘always’/‘never’ statements, because you set yourself up for an easy ‘defeat’ if a single contrary example is brought up.
It’s much more effective to compare per-capita statistics, for example.
Doesn’t “correct this behavior” very directly imply that the current behavior (in this case, taking your full lunch break) is incorrect and therefore in need of correction, though?
It’s one thing to suggest something, but calling it a “correction” changes things, I’d think.
You’re welcome!
Why miss the opportunity to say “bigly,”
Because the goal isn’t to sound stupid?
Dug a bit, and apparently this seat has literally never been held by a Republican; this is quite the misleading headline.
Her name is “Chasity”, by the way, not “Chastity”.
Lie—that was nonsense that went viral, and immediately collapsed under scrutiny. That claim was tweeted at Musk, and when he replied saying ‘explain how that would work and I’ll give you the money right now’, he got a sheepish response to the tune of ‘well actually, it would only help, not end it, and only temporarily’.
A more recent, actual estimate, puts it closer to $93 billion. And not once, but annually.
Stop being so gullible and falling for this sensationalized nonsense just because it confirms your biases.