ByteOnBikes@discuss.online to People Twitter@sh.itjust.works · 1 day agoBro these racists are so embarrassingdiscuss.onlineimagemessage-square182linkfedilinkarrow-up1887arrow-down110file-text
arrow-up1877arrow-down1imageBro these racists are so embarrassingdiscuss.onlineByteOnBikes@discuss.online to People Twitter@sh.itjust.works · 1 day agomessage-square182linkfedilinkfile-text
minus-squareluluberlue@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up7·1 day agofrenchy here : the second “t” isn’t silent at all, you’re confusing it with “petit”, the masculine version, where the second “t” is indeed silent.
minus-squareEvkob (they/them)@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up3·20 hours agoI think they were saying the second “t” in appétit is silent (which it is), not the one in petite.
minus-squarethatKamGuy@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 day agoI understand; I said “near-silent” because I don’t know of a better way to describe it (diminished? unemphisised? 🤷🏻♂️) Mind you, my experience with French is mostly limited to Duolingo and Google Translate - and could very well be wrong.
frenchy here : the second “t” isn’t silent at all, you’re confusing it with “petit”, the masculine version, where the second “t” is indeed silent.
I think they were saying the second “t” in appétit is silent (which it is), not the one in petite.
I understand; I said “near-silent” because I don’t know of a better way to describe it (diminished? unemphisised? 🤷🏻♂️)
Mind you, my experience with French is mostly limited to Duolingo and Google Translate - and could very well be wrong.