• Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Are these entries in the Wiki false?

      Nope, but they don’t describe any violence. Violence is harming PEOPLE, not damaging property.

      If you think that daubing weapons of genocide with red paint is violence, let alone makes you a fucking TERRORIST, you really need to reexamine your values.

    • Nester@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      23 hours ago

      They’re not false, but they don’t show the whole picture, as one paragraph seldom can.

      If you are referring the action in Runcorn, of which they are said to have “stormed, scaled, and occupied” the premises of the military equipment manufacturer at 4.30am, I wouldn’t say that counts as violence. I would say that violence is typically considered harm to a person or people, not windows and drones.

    • thejoker954@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      24 hours ago

      Did you even skim those entries?

      Where is the violence? All those entries amount to vandilism and maybe criminal mischief.

      • 8uurg@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        20 hours ago

        To play the advocate of the devil: vandalism does meet the first definition of violence here: Behavior or treatment in which physical force is exerted for the purpose of causing damage or injury. (Emphasis mine) It does not need to target a person.