• rainwall@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Not for decades. Only very, very recently have they gotten any appreciable press because Trumps admin fucked this up so badly.

        • lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Because it was frequently in the press? There’s no shortage of links to news reports & stories in the wikipedia articles on the victims, cases, topics.

            • lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              7 hours ago

              Because the reporters did their job? You know these reports started before social media was mainstream, right?

                • lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  6 hours ago

                  You can read up, can’t you? I didn’t claim

                  billionaire media owners will [gag victims from exercising their freedom of speech], mostly

                  So, I’m asking how that (apparent counterfactual) works. Does it withstand scrutiny?

                  • DrSteveBrule@mander.xyz
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    6 hours ago

                    I’m not saying you claimed anything. I’m asking what relevance there is as to whether the women made their claims on social media or not. I’m genuinely confused by the first comment of yours I replied to.