How do you measure their sincerity? Is it the charity drives? Is it the way he insults trans people? Or the way he makes fun of victims of SA? I’m curious.
I think your sources are either lying to you or not digging deeper than out of context clips.
I don’t know Hassan as well, but I would guess they’re on the same page. Vaush has never seriously insulted trans people or seriously made fun of SA victims. Vaush is pro trans. And has seriously looked at public SA accusations on social media. Vaush also gives moral guidance against SA.
As for the sincerity. He has explained his ideology from first principles. And they seem consistent to me. And his actions are in line with his ideology.
Now there’s no way to be sure of course. And you have a right to your own opinion.
I think we both agree that in order for it to be a grift it needs to be insincere, right?
From what I’ve seen, I think they’re both sincere.
What I’m hearing from you is that they’re not sincere because… They have money?
So if they had less money, but produce the exact same content they do today, you would cease to call them a grift?
Am I understanding you correctly?
How do you measure their sincerity? Is it the charity drives? Is it the way he insults trans people? Or the way he makes fun of victims of SA? I’m curious.
I think your sources are either lying to you or not digging deeper than out of context clips.
I don’t know Hassan as well, but I would guess they’re on the same page. Vaush has never seriously insulted trans people or seriously made fun of SA victims. Vaush is pro trans. And has seriously looked at public SA accusations on social media. Vaush also gives moral guidance against SA.
As for the sincerity. He has explained his ideology from first principles. And they seem consistent to me. And his actions are in line with his ideology.
Now there’s no way to be sure of course. And you have a right to your own opinion.