• dhork@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      74
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Read the article, her point is that if Trump could use his infamous deal making power to get Russia out of Ukraine without ceding any Ukrainian territory, then that would be a large enough achievement that she, personally, would nominate him.

      But she says it because she strongly suspects it would never happen. Trump will never stand up to Putin, and will have no problem selling our Ukraine in any peace settlement.

      • takeda@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        21 hours ago

        It would never happen, because so far everything he did his first term and this 7 months benefited the Russia.

        But if he would do it, why not? That would actually finally be something worth of a nomination.

        Somewhat related, but this is a great roast related to his desire of having a Nobel peace prize by India:

        https://youtu.be/gO_OE5G-R_E

      • pelespirit@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        21 hours ago

        Oh I know, I thought it was hilarious. She knew he was going to get owned at the meeting. He also didn’t know how to respond when he heard she said that, lol.

        • al_Kaholic@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          15 hours ago

          Wow what an insight she had, not everyone else on earth thought trump would epically fail at peace negotiations. /S

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        20 hours ago

        if Trump could use his infamous deal making power to get Russia out of Ukraine without ceding any Ukrainian territory

        Then he’d need to offer something of equal or greater value. So… Alaska? Idfk.

        Trump’s deals have enriched himself, consistently. This isn’t any different.

    • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      20 hours ago

      I don’t care about anything said by the woman who had such hubris to think she was guaranteed to win, thus running an unpopular campaign that resulted in his first term. Go away, lady.

        • blackbearjesus27@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          12 hours ago

          Both things can be true but absolutely. Look at everything that’s happened since and how folks have still been team MAGA.

          The election was just the first veil dropping. Actually more like the 3rd or so but still.