• shalafi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    17 hours ago

    There exists a legal term called “fighting words”. If a man walks up to me saying, “I’m going to fucking KILL YOU!”, I have every right to shoot him.

    We can easily argue that a direct physical threat isn’t in the same ballpark, but I am absolutely gleeful that Kirk was murdered.

    • L0rdMathias@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      17 hours ago

      In Germany, as far as the law is concerned, disrespecting someone’s honor is effectively the same as throwing the first punch.

    • testfactor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      17 hours ago

      A general call for someone’s death has never been ruled as fighting words in the history of US Law. But I don’t think that was really your point.

      The thing is, I see people calling for the death of Donald Trump all the time. I don’t think that means he’s morally justified in killing those people.

      That’s effectively what this comic is arguing, but in reverse.

      Look, I hate Charlie Kirk as much as the next guy, but that doesn’t mean we need to say that assassinating him was a good and just call.

      He can be a loathsome PoS, and shooting him to death extrajudicially can be a bad thing. Both those can be true at the same time.

      • pelespirit@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Honestly, I’m kind of sick of arguing about it. What’s done is done. The guy who most everyone says, “who died?” when they see it, has taken over the news cycle. Trumps fake ear injury didn’t get this much press.