Agreed, this problem isn’t just the children - its everybody. Its actually problematic that this is how the situation is perceived, that only a minority is being spoken of. It is a problem of all, highlighting the severity of this situation.
Fair, but straight males will generally look at the undressed bodies of grown women and enjoy it.
The general consensus among the same group when it comes to literal children though? Nobody really wants to see that. People who do stand out, and they are very strange to the rest of us, to the point of revulsion, anger, and malevolence. Like if it’s your child, or a child under your care, and you’re changing a diaper, or bathing a small child, it’s one thing, but for someone posting pictures of random children unclothed, that bothers most people. People who are not paedophiles have a drive to protect our young. It’s part of being a mammal; in general, mammals protect the young of the species.
But, absolutely. One thing I will say for AI generated porn (that is not CSAM) is, it can’t not consent. No human person’s propriety is being violated. You could say it encourages people to seek the real thing, but you can say that for all pornography. There is a counter-argument that virtual girls can be made to do things most real women wouldn’t do, but then again, there are enough who would for the right amount of money. Using AI or virtual girls, something like SFM (Source Film Maker, it’s a Valve-produced tool that lets you make movies using video game characters), no real person has to do those things if the AI, virtual girl, or SFM model is lifelike enough.
Hold up now, what I said that you quoted is not at all what you replied to.
I measure creepiness by what people post every day. Not by what some rando (you) does or doesn’t like. It wasn’t aimed at you, don’t take it personal. It’s just an observation of what people post.
Let me simplify what I said because you’re apparently not understanding:
You are creepy as hell for assuming it’s a normal straight male response to be aroused by nonconsensual content. You’re not “measuring” anything, you’re exposing your sick sexuality.
Please don’t stop on children, no one want their clothes being stripped off without their knowledge and consent, digitally or physically.
Agreed, this problem isn’t just the children - its everybody. Its actually problematic that this is how the situation is perceived, that only a minority is being spoken of. It is a problem of all, highlighting the severity of this situation.
Fair, but straight males will generally look at the undressed bodies of grown women and enjoy it.
The general consensus among the same group when it comes to literal children though? Nobody really wants to see that. People who do stand out, and they are very strange to the rest of us, to the point of revulsion, anger, and malevolence. Like if it’s your child, or a child under your care, and you’re changing a diaper, or bathing a small child, it’s one thing, but for someone posting pictures of random children unclothed, that bothers most people. People who are not paedophiles have a drive to protect our young. It’s part of being a mammal; in general, mammals protect the young of the species.
But, absolutely. One thing I will say for AI generated porn (that is not CSAM) is, it can’t not consent. No human person’s propriety is being violated. You could say it encourages people to seek the real thing, but you can say that for all pornography. There is a counter-argument that virtual girls can be made to do things most real women wouldn’t do, but then again, there are enough who would for the right amount of money. Using AI or virtual girls, something like SFM (Source Film Maker, it’s a Valve-produced tool that lets you make movies using video game characters), no real person has to do those things if the AI, virtual girl, or SFM model is lifelike enough.
As a certified straight male,
I do not enjoy AI content whatsoever, even less if it’s erotic. It’s like the visual equivalent of a blow-up doll: desperate and gross.
I would not enjoy content obtained without consent
Be less creepy please, or if you insist on being creepy, at least don’t purport to speak on behalf of other people who are less creepy than you.
Hold up now, what I said that you quoted is not at all what you replied to.
I measure creepiness by what people post every day. Not by what some rando (you) does or doesn’t like. It wasn’t aimed at you, don’t take it personal. It’s just an observation of what people post.
Let me simplify what I said because you’re apparently not understanding:
You are creepy as hell for assuming it’s a normal straight male response to be aroused by nonconsensual content. You’re not “measuring” anything, you’re exposing your sick sexuality.