Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net to Canada@lemmy.caEnglish · 2 days agoway to out BYD yourselfslrpnk.netimagemessage-square69linkfedilinkarrow-up1219arrow-down114
arrow-up1205arrow-down1imageway to out BYD yourselfslrpnk.netTrack_Shovel@slrpnk.net to Canada@lemmy.caEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square69linkfedilink
minus-squareCanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down2·22 hours agoLemmy seems to instinctively respond with “more transit” even when it doesn’t make sense. It’s hard to go too far with that one, but we’ve managed.
minus-squareCanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up2·edit-222 hours agoEventually yes, and we should. Does it have anything to do with trade policy with China in 2026? Not particularly; it’s sort of interconnected the way everything is, but that’s all. (Or was that the joke?)
minus-squareAvid Amoeba@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up3·edit-222 hours agoWell you said Lemmy says more transit too much, so … I had to oblige. 😄
Lemmy seems to instinctively respond with “more transit” even when it doesn’t make sense. It’s hard to go too far with that one, but we’ve managed.
We can have more transit!
Eventually yes, and we should. Does it have anything to do with trade policy with China in 2026? Not particularly; it’s sort of interconnected the way everything is, but that’s all. (Or was that the joke?)
Well you said Lemmy says more transit too much, so … I had to oblige. 😄