• FiniteBanjo@feddit.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    20 hours ago

    I honestly disagree that it has any use. Being a statistical model with high variance makes it a liability, no matter which task you use it for will produce worse results than a human being and will create new problems that didn’t exist before.

    • Cethin@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      17 hours ago

      If you’re running it locally you can set how much variance it has. However, I mostly agree, in that it creates a bunch of trash. This doesn’t mean it has no use though. It’s like the monkeys on a typewriter thought experiment, but the monkey’s output is fairly constrained so it takes much fewer attempts to create what you want. It depends on the complexity of the solution required whether it’ll come up with a good solution in a reasonable amount of tries. If it’s a novel solution, it probably never will, because it’s constrained to solutions it’s seen before.

    • hector@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Ai is useful for sorting datasets amd pulling relevent info in some cases, ie propublica has used it for articles.

      Obviously simple sorting for them, case law is too complicated for such sifting of data, it was trained on reddit after all.

      • FiniteBanjo@feddit.online
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        And when, not if but when, it makes a mistake by pulling hallucinated info or data then it’s going to be your fault, that’s why it’s a liability.

        • hector@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          12 hours ago

          The simple stuff it can do, trying to remember how propublica used it, but it was just like sifting through a database and pulling out all mentions of a word.

          When you get into giving case law, it’s way too complicated for it and it hallucinates.

    • chickenf622@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      19 hours ago

      The high variance is why I only use it for dead simple tasks, e.g. “create and array of US states abbreviations in JavaScript”, otherwise I’m in full agreement with you. If you can’t verify the output is correct the it’s useless.

      • GojuRyu@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Wouldn’t that be slower to do, simply because checking it got all states, didn’t repeat any and didn’t make up any would be slower than copying a list from the web and quickly turning that into an array by hand with multiline cursors?

      • eleijeep@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 hours ago

        That’s like one web search and then one shell command. You can probably just copy paste a column of a table from wikipedia and then run a simple search/replace in your text editor. Why are you feeding the orphan crushing machine for this?

        • bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Because its .01% easier to do this.

          Also many people laugh at you if you try to say how ai is destroying the environment for no reason. Doesn’t affect them, you go live in a cave you luddite!

    • frank@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      13 hours ago

      I think the best use is “making filler” so like in a game, having some deep background shit that no one looks at, or making a fake advertisement in a cyberpunk type game. Something to fill the world out that reduces the work of real artists if they choose to

      • FiniteBanjo@feddit.online
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        12 hours ago

        If you can’t be bothered to write filler then it’s an insult for you to expect others to read it. You’re just wasting people’s time.

        • frank@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 hours ago

          I guess the point is for people to not read the filler.

          I think of the text that’s too small to read on a computer in the background. It’s nice that it’s slightly more real looking than a copy/paste screen.

          Not even close to worth destroying the environment over, but it’s a neat use case to me

          • Catoblepas@piefed.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            5 hours ago

            I think of the text that’s too small to read on a computer in the background.

            Lorem ipsum has been used in typesetting since the 60s. If it’s not meant to be read, it doesn’t matter if it’s lorem ipsum text.

            Not trying to dogpile you, I just think even things that seem ‘useful’ for LLMs almost always have preexisting solutions that are decades old.

            • frank@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 hours ago

              Fair enough, I’m trying pretty hard to devil’s advocate the “it has zero use” commentary. I hate the AI hype and LLMs getting shoved down our throats. I try a little to imagine a world where it’s somewhat helpful, cuz that type of tech would’ve been cool if it wasn’t a dystopian nightmare socially.

              I mean long and short of it is Fuck AI and especially the people pushing it