At this point, I have no idea what you’re even trying to say here is. When you say stuff like ‘it doesn’t make it more reliable’, what do you mean by that?
If you agree that you can reliably detect LLM speech patterns, then do you agree or disagree that the speech contains many patterns that closely resemble LLM generated text?
Ah, resorting to personal attacks, now that you’ve admitted to having no actual point to make. You really have nothing better to do than harass strangers on the internet do you? Kind of a pathetic way to live bud.
I know how LLMs work. Nothing you say is going to convince me that me trying it myself is going to be more reliable than you trying it.
Like, what are you even disagreeing with me on?
At this point, I have no idea what you’re even trying to say here is. When you say stuff like ‘it doesn’t make it more reliable’, what do you mean by that?
If you agree that you can reliably detect LLM speech patterns, then do you agree or disagree that the speech contains many patterns that closely resemble LLM generated text?
Really?
You try it -> it has a certain level of reliability.
I try it -> that reliability doesn’t change.
That’s the only point I’m making. You just love to argue.
Oh I didn’t realize you were just making a tautology without actually saying anything. Seems like we know who’s the one that just likes to argue here.
For a guy that has nothing better to do than post on Lemmy 24/7 you sure do have a chip on your shoulder.
Ah, resorting to personal attacks, now that you’ve admitted to having no actual point to make. You really have nothing better to do than harass strangers on the internet do you? Kind of a pathetic way to live bud.
Pee pee poo poo
Yup, that’s the level of intellectual capacity you’ve consistently displayed throughout the discussion.
💩