• BigDiction@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Car theft laws merely protect the established players in the industry. If it was legal everybody and their uncle would be doing it, diluting the margins.

  • panda_abyss@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    75
    ·
    7 hours ago

    I’m not pirating movies, I’m training my brain to imagine films and come up with new ones.

    • wheezy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      Put a YOLO object detection training script on your PC. Boom! All my NAS is for training AI.

      Like, I know that’s not how laws work. Laws work to protect rich corporations and profits. But that’s the logic we got here.

        • wheezy@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Yeah. Unfortunately laws are written to protect companies and ensure those same companies can use the same law to punish individuals

          • Virtvirt588@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 hours ago

            This isn’t just seen in the laws. This kind of thing is happening within every perspective imaginable. One example is language, as certain words or quotes are purposly stripped off their original meaning to primarily deceive and fearmonger the people.

  • Grimy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    It’s race over with him the winner. Open source can’t afford that data. Google, OpenAI and Anthropic would be the only ones able to train a “legal” model. Chinese models would get banned the day after.

  • wheezy@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Ok. Any Joe with a GPU can train an AI. So I guess copyright is dead. You see my Unraid with 64TB of copyrighted material. All for AI training I’m doing.

  • Reygle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 hours ago

    I hope that’s the face he makes when his head falls in a wicker basket one of these days.

  • theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Same energy as a person I know who was complaining that their business can’t afford to expand if they have to offer healthcare plans to their employees.

  • ThePantser@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 hours ago

    They just need to train it like humans. Make it a robot and send it out in the world, send it to school. They won’t because that’s too slow and the robot will get its ass kicked by the bully robots or be shot by the school shooter robots. Maybe AI is not AI because it can’t learn on its own it has to be spoon fed info.

  • wheezy@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Don’t hate AI because copyright is being violated. Copyright was just invented and expanded to protect corporate profits. It has never and will never be something to protect artists.

    They will do the same here. Copyright will be changed to favor corporate profits. The only thing that will happen is that Disney and other big media corporations want a piece of the pie. No law favouring copyright protection with AI will EVER be for artists benefits.

    This is just corporate infighting. They’ll definitely say that it’s to “protect artists”. It’s not. Copyright never has been about protecting artists.

    • IAmYouButYouDontKnowYet@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      I bet the only reason we have access to AI right now is to entice us with it… Once they sort out laws and how they can use if for “them” it’ll be off limits to the common person.

      And you also know it will be fully raped with limits, ads, and algorithms.

  • inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    Honestly everyone and their mother sucks with this.

    Corporation who violate copyright suck.

    People who violate copyright suck.

    Everyone sucks with copyright and are like Republicans and abortions who think their violations are the only morally acceptable violations.

    • IAmYouButYouDontKnowYet@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      This Ai is an amazing concept but humanity doesn’t deserve it until they can get along and live peacefully.

      All peace up to this day feels like a soggy bandaid and false gimmick.

      Ai isn’t even going to be used for good, it’s going to be implemented for power and control and the ideology of whoever the winner is of the make believe insecure games they play.

    • Reygle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Just a thought: How can any AI tech ever be “open” when it can’t exist in the first place without rampant theft?

  • CoffeeSoldier@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Must be sampling error. Car thieves aren’t that agreeable. Has to be closer to 9/10. Even 1/10 dentists don’t agree that using toothpaste is important.