My favorite comment on the article is “The problem with capitalism is that you eventually run out of other people’s money."

  • night_petal@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    55
    ·
    3 days ago

    The last company to do this iirc was Motorola in 1997. You can buy them on the secondary market now for about 80 cents.

      • ebolapie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        2 days ago

        They’re actually around 80 bucks, versus an initial value of a cool hundo. But they also pay out like a 5% coupon rate annually, so if you had bought them in '97 you’d be slightly beating inflation.

        • wewbull@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 days ago

          So those are associated with Motorola Solutions now, or did the debt move to Lenovo?

          • ebolapie@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            Yeah, the debt belongs to Motorola Solutions now. Although it would have been very funny if they somehow stuck Lenovo with it.

          • BeardedGingerWonder@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            Coupon rate is paid on the principal - assuming the hundo is accurate then it’s $5/yr. If you think Motorola will be around in 14 years then you’d have your investment back. If you think they’ll be around in another 70 years you get $350 + $100 because when it matures they need to repay the bond.

              • BeardedGingerWonder@feddit.uk
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 day ago

                It could be, alternatively if the company goes out of business tomorrow you lose.

                The question you need to ask yourself is how it will do vs other options, I’m no investor by any means but I’d be wondering:

                a) would an index fund beat it long term (historically you might see 7% annual gains on a fund that tracks NYSE over the same period)

                b) why is it trading below its face value - everyone has the same information about this bond in theory, therefore bond traders are aware of the same thing, if it was a great deal it would be in demand and the price would rise. So someone more experienced than us has accounted for the return and the risk/reward for them says $80 is right.

                c) does it beat inflation - $450 payoff seems nice now (assuming you save up all those $5s) 30 years ago it would’ve seemed even better, but $100 in 1997 has the spending power of $200 today - in 70 years time the $450 might have the equivalent spending power of $100 today. Which is to say your real terms return may only be $20 over 70 years.

                • Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  23 hours ago

                  There seems to be a dispute if it’s 80 cents a piece, or 80% of the initial value?

                  Anyways, at 80 cents you’d get your money back in a couple of months, at $80 it’s another story of course…

                  Thanks for the thorough explanation!