If you’re in your basement, and someone gets stabbed in your kitchen, you somehow know the stabber’s intent?
Go back and read the original fucking article. If you’re really curious, go scrounge up the actual facts of the case presented to the grand jury.
“Okay, but what if I’m skeptical? What if I’m double skeptical? What if I’m fully incredulous? Then can I believe her father killed her in cold blood?” Sure. Believe whatever fairy tale you want to tell yourself.
So your point is that, believing only the murderer, after a heated discussion about Trump and guns, he took his daughter to a room where he was displaying the safety features of a loaded gun and accidentally shot and killed her daughter… and in this scenario, there is ZERO criminal liability?
You are arguing with me, a random asshole on the internet, when you should be arguing with the DA and the grand jury, which did not find the evidence in the case gathered by a professional investigation team compelling enough to indict on.
as far as I can tell, the only misquote is the date (which explains why it’s been posted so much this week)… if you have any official source that contradicts the many articles posted on this I am happy to read through but I have not found any so far
Schrodinger’s Source: if they do not provide a source then any source you provide is ‘biased’ and incorrect. They have a source with a ‘true account’ but you have to find it on your own.
Go back and read the original fucking article. If you’re really curious, go scrounge up the actual facts of the case presented to the grand jury.
“Okay, but what if I’m skeptical? What if I’m double skeptical? What if I’m fully incredulous? Then can I believe her father killed her in cold blood?” Sure. Believe whatever fairy tale you want to tell yourself.
So your point is that, believing only the murderer, after a heated discussion about Trump and guns, he took his daughter to a room where he was displaying the safety features of a loaded gun and accidentally shot and killed her daughter… and in this scenario, there is ZERO criminal liability?
You are arguing with me, a random asshole on the internet, when you should be arguing with the DA and the grand jury, which did not find the evidence in the case gathered by a professional investigation team compelling enough to indict on.
yes, I come to Lemmy to find DAs and argue a year old case in a country I do not live in…
This is the USA, and Texas to boot… there is no professional anything when it comes to guns or law… it’s basically a banana republic at this point
This is British tabloid news and people misquoting articles on social media.
as far as I can tell, the only misquote is the date (which explains why it’s been posted so much this week)… if you have any official source that contradicts the many articles posted on this I am happy to read through but I have not found any so far
Schrodinger’s Source: if they do not provide a source then any source you provide is ‘biased’ and incorrect. They have a source with a ‘true account’ but you have to find it on your own.
What facts in the original article or the case are you referring to?