floofloof@lemmy.ca to politics @lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 day agoTop Democrats re-introduce trans bill of rightswww.washingtonblade.comexternal-linkmessage-square66linkfedilinkarrow-up1287arrow-down16
arrow-up1281arrow-down1external-linkTop Democrats re-introduce trans bill of rightswww.washingtonblade.comfloofloof@lemmy.ca to politics @lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 day agomessage-square66linkfedilink
minus-squaredeltaspawn0040@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkarrow-up6arrow-down1·20 hours agoIt seemed like you were drawing a connection between attempting to, or at least signalling that they wanted to, protect trans people and losing.
minus-squareDevolution@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down2·edit-219 hours agoEstablishment Dems could care less about trans rights. They just think that they can claim the moral high ground. If they are sincere about this, then they will do it when they have a veto proof majority.
minus-squareWalrusDragonOnABike [they/them]@reddthat.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·17 hours agoHow will they ever get a veto-proof majority if they never have a vote before elections to show which ones who are against basic human rights?
minus-square😈MedicPig🐷BabySaver😈@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·16 hours ago couldn’t care less.
It seemed like you were drawing a connection between attempting to, or at least signalling that they wanted to, protect trans people and losing.
Establishment Dems could care less about trans rights. They just think that they can claim the moral high ground. If they are sincere about this, then they will do it when they have a veto proof majority.
How will they ever get a veto-proof majority if they never have a vote before elections to show which ones who are against basic human rights?