• Jarix@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    6 hours ago

    The rules have checks and balances. They just mean absolutely nothing when those who are supposed to use them don’t do their fucking jobs. Create more rules and they seemingly will just ignore them.

    Look at the order to release the Epstein files? Look at how enough dems cave just to give Trump everything he wants.

    It doesn’t end until people start being replaced or getting killed. That’s where America is at and there is plenty of examples from other nations guess this goes down. Time to start reading some new books

    • VindictiveJudge@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Ultimately, the rules work fine for what they were intended to do, which is prevent one branch of government from becoming much more powerful than the other two. However, they don’t work well against an entity like the Republican Party, which deliberately subverts multiple branches simultaneously. The rules against executive power have also been weakened over time due to congress ceding power to the president, something the founders hadn’t anticipated. They were prepared for greedy bastards that wanted to hoard power, but people giving power away to reduce their own responsibilities or achieve partisan goals was something they hadn’t even heard of.

    • BillyClark@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      There is no check for presidential pardons. Perhaps the pardon itself is supposed to be a check, but there is nothing to stop a president from pardoning criminals who were already serving completely justified sentences.