There were once so many children at Frisha Moore’s Elk Grove preschool that families filled up the waitlist. Now, one of her playgrounds and two classrooms sit empty because one key group of kids has stopped coming.

Dozens of families in recent years have opted not to enroll their 4-year-olds at Moore Learning Preschool & Child Care Center, she said. Instead, they’re putting their children in transitional kindergarten, California’s new public pre-kindergarten grade.

Even though she provides a full day of preschool, compared with transitional kindergarten that lasts only about 3.5 hours, Moore can’t compete: Public school is free. She hasn’t broken even in months and thinks about closing the preschool, “every single day.” That would remove 91 licensed child care spots from the county, including 20 for children under age 2, for whom child care options are particularly scarce.

Transitional kindergarten’s expansion is one of Gov. Gavin Newsom’s signature educational achievements and a key part of his legacy on how California cares for its youngest residents.

  • breadsmasher@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    im not american.

    the article literally quotes the owner of the daycare saying “school is free”. Which it isnt. that was a lie from the owner.

    • HermitBee@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      the article literally quotes the owner of the daycare saying “school is free”. Which it isnt. that was a lie from the owner.

      What would the sentence “school is free” actually mean then? Do you think the word “free” usually means that it hasn’t cost anyone any effort or money to produce? Because it basically always means “the person receiving it doesn’t pay for it”.

        • HermitBee@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          free at point of use.

          Im not playing petty semantic word games with you.

          Oh, but you’ll play them with the OP? How unfair.

          • breadsmasher@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            OP? I was responding to the content of the article. Not whoever posted it.

            You dont need to be this obtuse. Are you doing that intentionally?

            The quote was from the day care centre complaining about competing with “free daycare”.

            I replied to discuss what “free” means.

            You then decided to bring in even more specificity. Fine, whatever. But dont whine at me about not being as granular as you prefer.

            How about discussing the context of free/tax/paid for daycare and how a private daycare could compete?

            You dont need to cry that my wording isnt to your exact preference and expectations. Feel free to redefine it.