nytimes.com
www.nytimes.com

Documents released by the Justice Department briefly mention a woman’s unverified accusation that Donald J. Trump assaulted her in the 1980s, when she was a minor. But several memos related to her account are not in the files.

NPR also showed that a lot of pages are missing

  • ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.worldEnglish
    11·
    23 hours ago

    Your comments indicate you don’t have any idea what they found, or when, or what it means. For you to assert anything about evidence at all is ludicrous. You didn’t even get my name right. You couldn’t even tell, even after being prompted, that I was not OP. But you’re an expert on evidence.

    But I will give you credit for this: you are indeed an expert in demonstrating how someone tries desperately to elide the difference between fact and opinion, and what disinformation looks like in the real world, delivered with a dose of rage and trust me bro facts you pull out of your ass. And all anyone has to do is read the articles to know it.

    • doctordevice@lemmy.ca
      21·
      23 hours ago

      What facts have I pulled out of my ass? You think a few missing files that the article is talking about excuse the lack of action on the entire case?

      I’m not talking about these specific files, I’m talking about the whole thing. Which we can all see with our own eyes right now. You don’t need to trust me on anything, if you assert that the Biden administration did its job on this case, you need to prove that.

      • ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.worldEnglish
        11·
        21 hours ago

        I’m not talking about these specific files, I’m talking about the whole thing.

        Lol, okay. I never left the subject of the articles, which you have clearly never read and/or are unable to parse anyway.

        if you assert that the Biden administration did its job on this case, you need to prove that.

        Okay, so quote me asserting that.

        And this time try to quote me, not someone else. Good luck with that, on both counts.

        But what I’m really waiting for is even a fraction of your rage against Biden, who is not mentioned once, to appear against Trump, who is mentioned over 38,000 times.

        Your ire against Biden knows no bounds, to the point you don’t even know who you’re quoting; you seemed incoherent with rage.

        But your ire against Trump – not only a pedophile but directing the coverup – is nonexistent.

        Don’t think that goes without notice.

        EDITED to add link

        • doctordevice@lemmy.ca
          11·
          8 hours ago

          You inserted yourself in a conversation about the Democrats. Not about the goddamn article. My ire against Trump is that the pedo rapist isn’t rotting in prison for the rest of his life, and this entire conversation was started by someone insinuating Kamala would have done something about it. You jumped in and took their side in this argument, so you don’t get to back off now. For someone who goes on and on about insulting people for not reading context, it’s amazing that you can’t grasp that I was responding to a comment and not the article.

          The Democrats, particularly the executive leader for 4 years, did nothing with this evidence to root out the pedo rapist ring. My ire against Biden and the Democrats is that they were the only thing that could stand in the way of the fascist takeover they helped facilitate back in 2016 (Trump was Hillary’s pied piper). So am I mad at the Republicans and Trump? Of course, they’re pure evil. But I’m not ideologically aligned with them in the slightest. The Democrats claim to be ideologically aligned with me but never act on it, taking away my only sector of representation in our government. So yeah, I direct my ire at the group that is supposed to be doing something about this and chooses not to.

          In the meantime, any semblance of criticism against the Democrats is always met with assholes like you who can’t stand anyone calling out the ineffective controlled opposition.