supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz to politics @lemmy.world · 2 days agoKamala Harris might run for president again in 2028. Please, no | Arwa Mahdawiwww.theguardian.comexternal-linkmessage-square307linkfedilinkarrow-up1588arrow-down122
arrow-up1566arrow-down1external-linkKamala Harris might run for president again in 2028. Please, no | Arwa Mahdawiwww.theguardian.comsupersquirrel@sopuli.xyz to politics @lemmy.world · 2 days agomessage-square307linkfedilink
minus-squareHemingways_Shotgun@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9arrow-down5·14 hours agoI’m not saying she should. But the “I fucking told you so” campaign strategy might actually be somewhat effective for a certain percentage of swing voters.
minus-squareTwilitSky@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down1·9 hours agoThat strategy would be effective in pushing them toward candidates and parties that don’t them swallow their ego and admit mistakes as a condition of support.
minus-squarePrettyFlyForAFatGuy@feddit.ukcakelinkfedilinkarrow-up7·13 hours agoassuming that fair elections are still a thing at that time i’d say she would be guaranteed the win. which of course is exactly why they’re bringing this Dem stooge back. after all it is her turn
minus-squareMaki@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up6·11 hours agoWhat do you mean fair elections? AIPAC would still get their puppet. Just from the other side of the aisle.
minus-squareHemingways_Shotgun@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down5·13 hours agoI’m not actually convinced that she actually lost the last one, with Musk’s shenanigans and other jerry-rigging all over the electoral college. But I generally don’t bother dwelling on conspiracy theories. It is what it is, so we’ll see what happens.
I’m not saying she should.
But the “I fucking told you so” campaign strategy might actually be somewhat effective for a certain percentage of swing voters.
That strategy would be effective in pushing them toward candidates and parties that don’t them swallow their ego and admit mistakes as a condition of support.
assuming that fair elections are still a thing at that time i’d say she would be guaranteed the win.
which of course is exactly why they’re bringing this Dem stooge back.
after all it is her turn
What do you mean fair elections? AIPAC would still get their puppet. Just from the other side of the aisle.
I’m not actually convinced that she actually lost the last one, with Musk’s shenanigans and other jerry-rigging all over the electoral college.
But I generally don’t bother dwelling on conspiracy theories. It is what it is, so we’ll see what happens.