Lutris maintainer use AI generated code for some time now. The maintainer also removed the co-authorship of Claude, so no one knows which code was generated by AI.

Anyway, I was suspecting that this “issue” might come up so I’ve removed the Claude co-authorship from the commits a few days ago. So good luck figuring out what’s generated and what is not.

sauce 1

sauce 2

  • wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    170
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    14 hours ago

    The snipe from the dev about removing the co-authorship is particularly shitty.

    Devs of open source software need the thick skin to be able to say “This is how I’m going to handle things as long as I’m the lead, you don’t have to like it.” but this goes beyond it into an active “fuck you” to their users.

    Edit: the second link has less charged discussion, but it’s still getting wrapped up in “anthropic bad” stuff that’s not actually related to code quality.

    If the project is not the space for non-code quality concerns like Anthropic’s business dealings, then it is also not the place for one of the devs to try their personal social project of “seeing if contributors can differentiate between AI assisted commits and not”. Listing claude as a co-author where it was used serves a practical purpose of drawing extra eyes for review of relevant commits.