Trump supporters who backed his promise to avoid new Middle East wars worry Iran’s attacks on shipping are pushing the U.S. toward escalation — and maybe even boots on the ground.

When the U.S. started firing Tomahawk missiles at Iran late last month, many of Donald Trump’s allies hoped it would be a quick, surgical operation, similar to last year’s strike against Iran’s nuclear facilities or the ouster of Venezuelan dictator Nicolás Maduro in January.

Though uneasy, they were reassured by the belief that Trump’s open-ended objectives gave him the flexibility to declare victory whenever he saw fit.

Now, more than two weeks into the campaign, some of those allies believe the president no longer controls how, or when, the war ends. They fear Iran’s attacks on oil tankers in the Strait of Hormuz, which have rattled global crude markets and threaten broader economic distress, are boxing Trump into a situation where escalating the conflict — potentially even putting American boots on the ground — becomes the only way to credibly claim victory.

  • DagwoodIII@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    132
    ·
    3 days ago

    The sad thing is that even after this war decimates the US economy and leaves america as a complete laughingstock, the MAGats are going to happily vote for the next Trump.

    Losing Vietnam didn’t teach them anything, and neither will this fiasco.

    • coyootje@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      3 days ago

      happily vote for the next Trump

      You mean Trump himself? There’s no chance in hell he wouldn’t try to run again if he hasn’t kicked the bucket by then.

      It’s pretty unlikely he’ll make it until then and if he does die I’m not sure who will be his successor (definitely not charisma black hole JD) but if not then he’s too proud to give anyone else a chance.

      • phutatorius@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        15 hours ago

        There’s no chance in hell he wouldn’t try to run again

        It won’t involve running. He just won’t fuck off.

      • DagwoodIII@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        29
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        MTG played it pretty smart.

        She retired from Congress and isn’t running in November. I predict she will be omnipresent as a pundit and set herself up nicely for 2028 GOP Convention.

        He has plenty of successors in waiting.

        • coyootje@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 days ago

          I don’t think MTG has a chance, she’s alienated too much of the republican party. Also, she’s a woman. They never do well, especially not in the republican party.

          • DagwoodIII@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            She could make herself a power in the Party and position herself as a kingmaker.

            More will be revealed.

        • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          3 days ago

          It’s the Paul Ryan gamble.

          The equivalent of pulling your funds out of a market before a crash and hoping to buy back in low.

          She’s hoping trump goes down and then she can fill the void

          • NekoKoneko@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            3 days ago

            Yup, both the Paul Ryan and stock market metaphors are apt.

            But taking the Paul Ryan comparison to its conclusion is probably also apt - he never had the chance to buy back in low, because he didn’t factor in that this particular market has no bottom. The only rational move with the GOP, ever, is to just cash out and leave forever.

      • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        MAGA is a classic Cult of Personality, and Trump’s death will be the end. Like all Dictators, he won’t name a successor because he doesn’t want to give any power to anyone else, so he’ll let Rubio and Vance fight it out for his own entertainment.

        Meanwhile there are a bunch of MAGA losers entertaining the fantasy of taking over MAGA when Trump dies. Guys like Don Jr. You don’t think he feels like he’s ENTITLED to succeed his father to the throne? Or Hegseth? Or Lindsey Graham? Or DeSantis? Or Abbot? Or Tucker Carlson?

        When Trump assumes room temperature, the knives are going to come out, and the backstabbing will begin. It will be glorious.

    • Doomsider@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Decimated is only 1/10th. Trump likes to use it a lot, but doesn’t know what it means.

      • DagwoodIII@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Decimated does come from the practice of killing one prisoner in ten.

        And it has come to be synonymous with ‘devastated.’

        I was using it in the sense of ‘severely maimed.’ Losing a hand or a foot won’t kill you but it is pretty bad.

        The funny thing is that I first read the word in a spy thriller, where an agent realizes his boss has been replaced with a double when the phony misuses the word.

      • tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        The orange blob has done enough dumb things to mock him for without using archaic definitions as gotchas.

    • Not a newt@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      3 days ago

      They’re going to frame it as “See? The most powerful navy in the world is struggling, imagine how worse a threat Iran world be if Trump hadn’t intervened! He’s a tactical jenius!”

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      even after this war decimates the US economy

      War has traditionally been a boon to the American economy, as the US workforce is heavily integrated into the Military Industrial Complex. The surge in state spending under the Trump administration, combined with the construction boom from AI, is what’s currently keeping us out of recession. And domestic oil exports only benefit when countries like Kuwait and Qatar can’t export fossil fuels.

      Losing Vietnam didn’t teach them anything

      It’s the Max Bialystock strategy. You win by losing. Another multi-decade long military engagement means multiple trillions of dollars invested in equipment, technology, and private contractors.

      Iran, Ukraine, Venezuela, I guess Cuba is next, maybe we get to Nigeria or North Korea down the line… the wars never end and the profits never stop flowing.

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      The problem has been “the only other option” was neoliberal who won’t help us either, but are bad liars about it.

      We got a fair DNC again, we can get a FDR style Dem who actually helps people, meaning Dem turnout doesn’t get depressed and the next shitty Republican doesn’t get an open court layup.

      That’s all it takes to break that cycle. It’s why neoliberals were always willing to lose a general in the primary if it meant stopping a progressive.

      They never had the same goal as Dem voters, but Dem voters got the DNC back from neoliberals over a year ago.

      • ape_arms@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        I appreciate your optimism, but I am skeptical that anything is really changing for the DNC.

        • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          Martin ran Minnesota for a decade and the results are very easy to look into.

          We’re a year into the largest reinvesture from DNC to state parties. Which is important because:

          1. The victory fund stealing that money is why we lost the House

          2. The money going back is why we keep winning special election.

          3. The victory fund and the legitimate threat that money would be withheld was the threat that kept neoliberala in congressional leadership.

          And Martin has publicly said he wants a charismatic progressive presidential candidate, his example was Mamdani. And he said that right after his primary before he was a sure thing.

          There’s more going on, I’ll never be blindly optimistic about anything.

      • TronBronson@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        2 days ago

        Ya pretty much since Covid. It’s hard to have a free market when all the capital is in the hands of a handful of people.

        • Bloodyhog@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          2 days ago

          Way before that, actually. At the very least, since GFC of 2008. Traditional valuation models died long ago. My vague belief is that the only deciding factor for markets now is the amount of capital free for investing (and that multiplied massively through QE and covid handouts). So we have trillions of dollars sloshing around looking for a home. Be loud as Musk and it will flow your way, regardless of what you are actually producing. Hence the unhinged valuations of several top companies.

          • TronBronson@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            2 days ago

            Well said. The GFC certainly laid the ground work and created the idea of “maybe we should print a lot of money instead of allowing stocks to decline.” They mastered the art in time for Covid tho. PPP loans and bailing out banks and all kinds of tricks came together in 2020 to create massive wealth inequality in a short span of time. The last 6 years have felt much more painful than the previous 12

  • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    Child kicks hornets’ nest, friends of child are shocked that hornets got angry and started stinging people at random and don’t just give up and leave their honey behind.

  • ramble81@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    3 days ago

    Iran is slipping beyond the President’s control

    I’ve become more critical of the way I’m reading headlines lately and this one stuck out to me. The implication is that a sitting leader of one sovereign nation should have control of another sovereign nation or that the latter nation should be “subservient” to them. It’s really interesting how the build the intended power dynamic with that one sentence.

    • some_designer_dude@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      3 days ago

      I read it differently. That sentence makes it sound like the “President” is actually a competent leader whose plans are falling apart, rather than the dangerously stupid puppet that he is. All media outlets keep sane-washing him like he has plans to begin with, is capable of strategic thought, and is somehow actually trying to do any kind of good for anyone but himself and his handlers.

      America is rat-fucked until the people can establish at least one media outlet that isn’t indifferent to all the evil being perpetrated against them.

      • Lucelu2@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        If anyone in any responsible position, listened to that 45 minute CNN interview where he repeatedly contradicted himself would give him some Seroquel and send Grandpa back to the Rainbow room for his evening mush.

    • notwhoyouthink@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 days ago

      I read it as control of the situation, particularly his self perceived control of the war. Weird for a headline to play to that. Your critique is valid, the headline is poorly written.

    • aramis87@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 days ago

      I particularly liked the underlying assumption throughout the article that Trump absolutely has to have Iran capitulate and therefore the only thing they can do is to continue to escalate. That “declare victory and leave” isn’t something they’ve even considered.

      • Cuddles McBubblefun@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        The problem with the ‘declare victory and leave’ is that the enemy gets a vote. Even if shitler pulled forces back, Iran ain’t got no reason to stop shooting tankers now.

        Also… Do we just have two carrier groups trapped in the Gulf now? Guess our navy is just gonna have to ‘man up’ like he told the tankers to? That could get real spicy REAL quick.

        • Cuddles McBubblefun@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          Also, fun fact! We decommissioned our minesweeper fleet in the Gulf, the last of them were shipped out from Bahrain in January. You know, just weeks before we started a damn naval war. All we got now is some equipment bolted onto repurposed LCS…

          • Lucelu2@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            6 months before that Patel and Hegseth fied a ton of Mideast counterterroism experts.

    • humanspiral@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      implication is that a sitting leader of one sovereign nation should have control of another sovereign nation

      This is normal US media implication since 1940s. Supreme right. The control reference in article seems to be that there may have been some minor miscalculations about whether “allies” would be made to die to impose US authority on Iran, and to obtain certain glory, we’ll just start a mandatory draft, and shoot any protestors. It’s the only way, and we are not allowed any other ideas.

  • 🌞 Alexander Daychilde 🌞@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    3 days ago

    We clearly just kicked [Iran’s] ass in the field,

    hahahahahahah

    “Thanks to a detailed planning process, the entire administration is and was prepared

    hahahahaHAHAHAHAhahahahaha

    President Trump knew full well

    HAHAHAHahahaaaahahahaaaa… oh man…

    any disruptions to energy are temporary and will result in a massive benefit to our country and the global economy

    hahahahahhahaAHHAHAHAHAHaaahhhahaha

  • Lemmyng@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    3 days ago

    HE NEVER HAD ANY CONTROL TO BEGIN WITH! Trump has about as much control of Iran as he does with his bowels.

  • bagsy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 days ago

    It was so easy to steal America with Elon’s help. Surely stealing Iran and all of its oil will be much easier.

  • switcheroo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 days ago

    Hold the cards? That orange shitgibbon has a handful of Uno cards while everyone else is playing poker-- he’s not even playing the same game. He needs to be put in a home for criminals with dementia then sealed in.

  • BigMacHole@thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    3 days ago

    This is SILLY because Trump OBVIOUSLY took us to War with FULL Knowledge of Who and What he was Up against! Trump would NEVER Risk American Lives so Silly like That! THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION TO THIS MATTER!