• hoserhobbes@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    9 hours ago

    You seriously think high grocery costs are due to unions? How are you both pro-communism and anti-union?

    • maplesaga@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      Its an interesting question, obviously a union would raise prices of goods. Which prevents poor people working in things like nail salons from affording food as easily, as the unionized grocer becomes a highly coveted position which gatekeeps food from the people that cant get hired there due to demand.

      • hoserhobbes@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 hours ago

        In an idyllic world where no capitalist greed is focused on maximizing shareholder value that might be a more significant concern. But in modern day, a union raising their wages by 10% might result in less than a 1% increase in user prices. Whereas the ruling class of capitalists are the true source of greedflation making products unaffordable.

        If anything in your example I would argue that the better solution is actually more unions. Those nail salon workers should also earn living wages to afford the goods, which unions would fight for. I would be shocked to learn of any case where a union could be compared to the average elite-class capitalist in terms of greed.

        • melsaskca@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 hour ago

          Playing with numbers while the stark reality of societal decay dances all around you. I can’t blame you for being an idealist though. Being an idealist gives you standards to shoot for, and that is beneficial.