Please note this does not mean the USSR wasn’t that way. Just want to clarify I’m not a tankie, lol.

  • Rato@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Was not a nuclear explosion, sure, reactors can’t really explode in the same way as bombs, but it absolutely was a meltdown. Meltdown really just means that the fuel melted, which did happen shortly after the power peak flashed the coolant to steam and blew open the core.

    • BradleyUffner@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Yep, just to add, it’s entirely possible to have a melt down without any explosion at all. As you said, It just means the fuel melted through the reactor vessel. It can even happen without the fuel going prompt-critical.