• nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Jon himself is not behind this idea, he constantly reminds people he’s just a comedian. We need to stop confusing age, fame, whiteness, and being male with actual experience.

    • ooterness@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Counterpoint from Douglas Adams:

      The major problem—one of the major problems, for there are several—one of the many major problems with governing people is that of whom you get to do it; or rather of who manages to get people to let them do it to them. To summarize: it is a well-known fact that those people who must want to rule people are, ipso facto, those least suited to do it. To summarize the summary: anyone who is capable of getting themselves made President should on no account be allowed to do the job.

      I am 100% in favor of Jon Stewart for president, especially if he refuses to run.

    • Monument@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Well…

      Stewart dropped a line that made Hasan pause: maybe Democrats just need “the right reality host” to take over the party.
      Hasan’s reflexive response — please, no more reality hosts — came with one notable exception: “Unless Jon, you’re thinking of throwing your hat in the ring… we can talk about that.”
      Stewart laughed. He didn’t deny it. He didn’t wave it off. He just leaned back, smiled, and chuckled.

      As another commenter brought up, when the idea has been suggested in the past, Jon has unequivocally and instantly shut it down.

      Big “Hmmmmm” vibes here.

    • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Actual experience is irrelevant to the office of the President.

      Being able to listen, learn, and discriminate between lies and truth are what matters.